<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reuters Soccer Blog &#187; Stadiums</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer</link>
	<description>World Soccer views and news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>World Cup could fall flat if South Africa carry on losing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/09/10/world-cup-could-fall-flat-if-south-africa-carry-on-losing/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/09/10/world-cup-could-fall-flat-if-south-africa-carry-on-losing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gleeson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters Soccer Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mark Gleeson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[qualifying]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[South Africa 2010]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stadiums]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/09/10/world-cup-could-fall-flat-if-south-africa-carry-on-losing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
South Africa&#8217;s hosting of the World Cup is supposed to be a watershed for the world game and the African continent, an opportunity to emphasise the international flavour of the game and at the same time give an under privileged continent a chance to prove its potential and bask in the world spotlight.
To that end South Africa is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/09/10/world-cup-could-fall-flat-if-south-africa-carry-on-losing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s your least favourite stadium?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/03/19/whats-your-least-favourite-stadium/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/03/19/whats-your-least-favourite-stadium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Meadows</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters Soccer Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Juventus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stadio delle Alpi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stadiums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/03/19/whats-your-least-favourite-stadium/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Juventus have decided to redevelop the moth-balled Stadio delle Alpi, one of the most unloved stadiums in the world.
Built for the 1990 World Cup, most Juve fans have always hated the Turin stadium because a running track kept them too far from the pitch and the acoustics were terrible. The 69,000 capacity ground was also hardly ever [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/03/19/whats-your-least-favourite-stadium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
