Reuters Soccer Blog
World Soccer views and news
Is Eduardo’s two-match ban too harsh?
UEFA’s decision to hand Arsenal striker Eduardo da Silva a two-match ban for diving has infuriated the Croatian media, many fans and national team coach Slaven Bilic.
“It is a shameful decision, especially in view of the fact that Eduardo personifies everything that’s decent in professional sport,” Bilic told Zagreb daily Vecernji List after learning the verdict.
Fans and media have gone to even greater length in defending the Brazilian-born Croatia striker, who has won the hearts and sympathy of his adopted country after recovering from a horrific leg break he suffered in Arsenal’s Premier League match at Birmingham in February 2008.
The sense of injustice in Croatia wasn’t helped by last weekend’s injury suffered by Tottenham playmaker Luka Modric, who faces up to six weeks on the sidelines after breaking his leg in a league match with Birmingham (again).
Croatia’s leading sports website, www.sportnet.hr, had harsh words.
“Eduardo has been punished in a most detestable manner, supposedly so that justice is done, while justice was deaf, dumb and blind only 18 months earlier when he was in bed with his ankle shattered and his career hanging by a thread,” the website said.
Is Eduardo a victim of double standards, or simply his own ill-judged decision to go down rather easily after minimum or no contact with the goalkeeper?
Edwardo should never have been punished at all because he did not dive. It should be remembered that he just returned from a year-long injury. He appeared to anticipate a tackle and took evasive action. If he had planted his legs on the ground and the Celtic goalie slip against them and injure him, he would be saying sorry, which doesn’t heal anything.Players are humans and can genuinely fall without trying to get a penalty. It should only be call a dive if someone falls without being touched and actually persuades a referee to give a penalty.Players should take evasive action from being injured without the Scots talking down their self-appointed “moral high grounds”.