Reuters Blogs

Left field

The Reuters global sports blog

06:05 March 24th, 2009

Opinions divided on England’s Ashes leg-up to Aussies

Posted by: Tom Pilcher
Tags: cricket, , , , , ,

The recent announcement that two Australian cricketers will play English county cricket before the Ashes has been met with stinging criticism and bewilderment in the UK.

Opening batsman Phil Hughes, who’s just played in the third test against South Africa and is fresh from becoming the youngest batsman (at 20) to hit two centuries in a match, and opening bowler Stuart Clark, chief destroyer of England in the 2006-7 Ashes with 26 wickets, will play for Middlesex and Kent respectively.

Cue a whole lot of English whining.

Ex-England wicketkeeper Alec Stewart has hit out at the idea, and radio phone-ins would suggest a lot of the public are also angry that English cricket will be helping rivals find form before the big series.

Several Australians called in too, and one said if a half-fit Andrew Flintoff was allowed to play some warm-up matches before an Ashes series in Australia’s domestic competition (the Sheffield Shield) then some of their finest cricket grounds might be burned to the ground.

Of course there’s also the argument that English youngsters should be given the chance to play at county level, and the decision to allow Hughes and Clark to come for a handful of games seems only to benefit the Australians.

On the other hand, former England bowler and Stewart’s team mate Angus Fraser has no problem with the decisions. He would rather see a high-level competitive battle between two fit and ready sides than a lopsided affair.

And one radio caller said let them come and play; we’ll only get a better look at them that way.

This debate will surely run and run until the first Ashes ball is bowled at Sophia Gardens in Cardiff on July 8.

PHOTO: Australia’s Stuart Clark bowls during training in St. George’s, Grenada, June 26, 2008. REUTERS/Andy Clark

One comment so far

The whining just shows England for what they are. A nervous and talentless side.
In the run-up to the 2005 series England had a solid bowling and batting unit, and although Australia were much more formidable then, there was room for optimism among English supporters.
This time round it shouldn’t be any different. Australia are no longer formidable, they simply don’t have a bowling attack capable of what Warne and McGrath were capable of, and England are again the underdogs, their favoured position.
Sorry to go on, but this debate also highlights how inept the ECB are.
Prior to the 2006-7 Ashes down under, England had time for (I think) two warm-up games. The side being totally unprepared was crushed 5-0. Oh dear.
The Australians on the other hand are already planning for their Ashes assault. Maybe they are formidable after all…………..

- Posted by Graham

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.