Reuters Blogs

Left field

The Reuters global sports blog

14:53 October 28th, 2009

Should Agassi face action for drugs confession?

Posted by: Mark Meadows
Tags: Tennis, ,

rtxpzkf2agassi

Eight-times grand slam winner Andre Agassi left the tennis world in a state of shock on Wednesday when he admitted using the recreational drug crystal meth and lying to men’s governing body the ATP to escape a ban.

In his autobiography “Open”, the American candidly describes being introduced to the drug in 1997 and the moment when he was informed he had failed a drugs test.

International Tennis Federation (ITF) president Francesco Ricci Bitti said he was “surprised and disappointed” by the revelations and World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) chief John Fahey called on the ATP to “shed light” on the circumstances that allowed Agassi to escape sanction.

Should there be any punishment against the retired 39-year-old?

PHOTO: Andre Agassi of the U.S. looks on during an exhibition tennis match against compatriot Pete Sampras at Venetian Macao in Macau October 25, 2009. REUTERS/Bobby Yip

6 comments so far

I am an avid tennis player and have been following tennis since the mid-80’s. Fact is, until 1999, the ITF and ATP tour didn’t have a strict drug policy. So, players could simply partake in illicit activities and then if caught, could concoct a story like Agassi did, stating that he accidentally took a sip of his friends soda that had Meth in it. Fact is further, that ALL players could get away with this at the time. So, you know what this means….many of the players were definitely living the “high life” during their down times out on the town, with friends, parties, etc. So, if you go after Agassi, you’d certainly have to go after other players, which would be impossible. I’m pretty sure that a statue of limitations certainly would apply to Agassi here, after more than 10 years beyond the incident.

My opinion is that he was just having fun, needed a quick hitter, and ripped up a couple rails and had a great time. So WHAT! People should be able to have a good time away from whatever their profession is. I’m glad he had fun and was tearing up rails when he needed a nice little break from his downward career and his tough relationship (breaking up with Brooke at the time).

You go Andre!

- Posted by Brian

I honestly do not think Andre should be punished. I think he should rather be commended for coming out with the truth. The Tennis authorities on the other hand should take this as lesson learnt and be guided in future legislation.

On the other hand if it is found out that Andre told this story only to sell his book and profit through deceit then obviously he should sanction by paying a huge fine that should hit his pocket big time. But can this be proved? What other sanction can impact a retired tennis player?

- Posted by Francis

I was just posing the question myself. I’m not sure if the authorities can do anything with a retired player A fine, ban him from commentating at the tournaments? Maybe not

- Posted by Mark

If Agassi is trying to use a scandal to sell more books, I think it might backfire on him

- Posted by Greg Delaney

I though Andre used a recreational drug, not a performance enhancing one. I don’t see any point in punishing him. Anyway, punishing him now does not make sense. If the doping authority deems this illegal, then he should have been caught during the tournament itself. It’s a mistake on part of the authorities. The world knows Andre has been a gentleman and a sincere player.

- Posted by Harish

[...]  Blog archive – Should Agassi be punished over drug use? [...]

- Posted by Agassi legend lives on « Peterlennox’s Blog

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.