Left field

The Reuters global sports blog

Can European soccer learn from NFL on team parity?

September 22, 2010

NFL/
The NFL prides itself on ‘parity’, on the competitive balance between different clubs being close, ensuring that games are tightly-fought contests and that as many teams as possible start the season with some sort of chance of making the Super Bowl.

Looking at the start to this season, with surprise results and with unfancied teams such as Houston and Tampa making bright starts, the balance is very healthy.

There are a number of mechanisms in place in the NFL to ensure that an elite group of winners and a desperate group of losers do not form. The salary cap which makes sure that cash doesn’t talk too much and the draft, which gives the lowest ranked team the first pick of the best college talent, are the two most obvious means by which the NFL ensures that things stay interesting.

On the surface at least, it seems a remarkably socialist system for a profit-orientated American sports league to have in place. Money and talent is spread around equally to ensure that there is a healthy equality. It hardly seems appropriate for a society that prides itself, in theory at least, on being a free-market capitalist system, with choice and opportunity prioritized above fairness and equality.

Not only does the NFL limit the ability of owners to spend their way to success, it also saves teams from failure. Unlike in most sports leagues in the world, there is no relegation for weak teams — no punishment for being bad. Indeed the draft system is almost a little welfare-state style form of assistance.

In contrast, Premier League soccer in England (or Serie A in Italy or La Liga in Spain for that matter) operates the most laissez-faire style of capitalism you could imagine. If you are a young Russian billionaire or a Saudi businessman with cash to spare (or an American NFL owner for that matter) you can buy a team and assemble the best players and coaches that your money can buy. No-one will tell you how much you can pay your staff or how much you can blow on transfer fees.

The result of allowing that disparity has been that since Blackburn Rovers won the English title in 1995 only three clubs – Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United have finished champions. In that same period 12 teams, over a third of the NFL, have won the Lombardi Trophy.

Spain, with Barcelona and Real Madrid and Italy with AC Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus, are similarly dominated by a small number of wealthy clubs with most of the teams beginning the year knowing that they have virtually no chance of winning the competition they are involved in. Throughout Europe, clubs are in huge debt despite lucrative television and sponsorship deals.

So is there something that European soccer can learn from the NFL? I believe there is, even if one has to acknowledge that there will always be some very big differences between the way top professional leagues are organized in North America and Europe.

There is no way that European fans would accept no promotion or relegation between the leagues and likewise it is hard to imagine a return of the old maximum wage rule that once kept wages down in English football and there will obviously never be a draft system.

But an overall salary cap for each team would go some way to allowing the challenging clubs to have a realistic chance of getting their hands on the title and would weaken the grip of elite clubs. That would surely create more compelling matches and better overall competition in the main European leagues.

But would it ever happen?

PHOTO: Washington Redskins chase Houston Texans Arian Foster in the second quarter of NFL football game in Landover, Maryland, September 19, 2010. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Comments

I think there is a happy medium. Part of the fun of soccer is that small teams enjoy facing the giants. if Everton, Newcastle and Aston Villa had been the last thre champions it wouldnt be so exciting to play a particular side.
Dynasties (short as they were) like the 49ers, Cowboys, Patriots and Colts help create greatness but i guess if an NFL team can dominate for some years then it means they really are strong

Posted by mark-meadows | Report as abusive
 

Soccer fans like it the way it is. With European leagues you get the brand you support, with American leagues you never know when your team is gonna be good or not, the wild shifts and bad management are unfair to fans who support their teams. And the biggest teams in Europe are in the biggest cities where the market spends and therefore the team can spend. Why should the most people have to endure a pitiful team like the New York Knicks? And you reference the NFL but why haven’t you noticed that the MLB does fine without a salary cap. Please don’t try to infect European leagues with the NFL again.

Posted by jrbell84 | Report as abusive
 

The Knicks show that you have to manage well within your cap don’t they?

The biggest weakness of the Premier League is that there are only a few teams that have a real chance of winning it.

The days when Forest, Villa and Everton could win the league are over.

Likewise in Italy – can you imagine Cagliari or Bologna winning another Serie A title?

That’s sad.

Posted by simongevans | Report as abusive
 

If UEFA had the Champions League replace the teams’ domestice leagues, THEN you would have parity. A proper season with a league table.

Posted by birizarry | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •