Left field
The Reuters global sports blog
Couldn’t Strauss try batting his way back to form?
England’s decision to allow “jaded” captain Andrew Strauss to miss next month’s tour to Bangladesh will leave many fans scratching their heads.
At a time when England are looking to lick the team into shape for their Ashes defence against Australia at the end of the year, it seems odd for the skipper not to be leading his troops from the front. Instead, it will be a “very excited” Alastair Cook who takes charge.
Strauss certainly does need to do something about his form. His team were fortunate to tie the four-match series 1-1 in South Africa after scraping two draws in Centurion and Cape Town by the skin of their teeth, and the captain himself was way below his best with the bat, scoring just 170 runs at an average of 24.28.
But rather than an extended rest, he could consider that the best way for a test batsman to regain his form is to play in a test. And given that Bangladesh’s bowlers are hardly the most fearsome in world cricket, shouldn’t an out-of-touch opener be relishing the opportunity?
Now the tour of South Africa is over, England have a four-week break before they leave for three Twenty20 matches in the Middle East ahead of the trip to Bangladesh.
Isn’t four weeks enough for Strauss to recharge his batteries before getting out there again to try to do what a batsman does best — and bat?
PHOTO: England’s captain Andrew Strauss (L) with Alastair Cook after South Africa defeated England in the fourth cricket test match at the Wanderers ground, Johannesburg, January 17, 2010. REUTERS/Philip Brown


I cant make my mind up. On the one hand i agree with the article, but then i think…it’s only Bangladesh. He would probably get the same batting practice in the nets with Merlin, but without having to be away from his family where he can genuinely recharge his batteries.
Slippery slope though, I agree, although if captaincy makes Cook a better batsman like it did Strauss, England may benefit further in the future