<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney&#8217;s heart, CVS and privacy, and Wal-Mart&#8217;s guns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/2012/04/17/cheneys-heart-cvs-and-privacy-and-wal-marts-guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/2012/04/17/cheneys-heart-cvs-and-privacy-and-wal-marts-guns/</link>
	<description>Steven Brill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: person492</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/2012/04/17/cheneys-heart-cvs-and-privacy-and-wal-marts-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>person492</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/?p=267#comment-164</guid>
		<description>While it may seem &quot;obvious&quot; that insurance companies would rather you forgot your prescription, its actually far more expensive for them if you forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it may seem &#8220;obvious&#8221; that insurance companies would rather you forgot your prescription, its actually far more expensive for them if you forget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txgadfly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/2012/04/17/cheneys-heart-cvs-and-privacy-and-wal-marts-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>txgadfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/?p=267#comment-162</guid>
		<description>A much, much more accurate and revealing tag for the &quot;Stand your ground&quot; laws is &quot;self-defense legalization&quot; laws. 

The conglomeration of groups brought out by the Trayvon Martin case is amazing!  In addition to anti-self-defense groups, we have anti-gun groups, anti-some-other-race-or-ethnic-group groups, anti Neighborhood Watch groups also calling themselves anti-vigilante groups (at least anti some vigilantes), and pro-Police State groups.  All of them essentially avoid the facts of the two human beings involved and wave their particular group&#039;s flag.  It is surprising it has not yet been used to sell merchandise.  Oh.  Too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A much, much more accurate and revealing tag for the &#8220;Stand your ground&#8221; laws is &#8220;self-defense legalization&#8221; laws. </p>
<p>The conglomeration of groups brought out by the Trayvon Martin case is amazing!  In addition to anti-self-defense groups, we have anti-gun groups, anti-some-other-race-or-ethnic-group groups, anti Neighborhood Watch groups also calling themselves anti-vigilante groups (at least anti some vigilantes), and pro-Police State groups.  All of them essentially avoid the facts of the two human beings involved and wave their particular group&#8217;s flag.  It is surprising it has not yet been used to sell merchandise.  Oh.  Too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneOfTheSheep</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/2012/04/17/cheneys-heart-cvs-and-privacy-and-wal-marts-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>OneOfTheSheep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/stories-id-like-to-see/?p=267#comment-159</guid>
		<description>1.  Transplant &quot;priorities&quot;:  Would stripping the cloak of anonymity from those people who must be available 24/7 to make such decisions make it impossible to get the necessary professionals to accept such appointment?  Who does that benefit?

2.  Robocalls from pharmacies: I think these serve a legitimate purpose for some of the elderly.  Perhaps the inquiry should not reveal the person&#039;s name by way of inquiry, but only the name and dose of the medication.  That&#039;s specific enough to serve the purpose of identification, and unspecific enough to absolutely protect individual privacy.

3.  So the New York TIme doesn&#039;t like ALEC.  That&#039;s news?  Picking our Walmart for speculation as to how it&#039;s &quot;...lobby and spend campaign contribution money...&quot; on various issues &quot;dovetail&quot; with &quot;...Wal-Mart’s obvious interest in confining sales of anything to established retailers...&quot; is the &quot;job&quot; of left leaning media purported pundits to discover and reveal (if it&#039;s newsworthy).  To presume it anyone else&#039;s business when it is NOT newsworthy is simply to unjustly dignify the intrusiveness of our already out-of-control &quot;gossip society&quot;.

Be careful what you ask for...you just may someday get it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Transplant &#8220;priorities&#8221;:  Would stripping the cloak of anonymity from those people who must be available 24/7 to make such decisions make it impossible to get the necessary professionals to accept such appointment?  Who does that benefit?</p>
<p>2.  Robocalls from pharmacies: I think these serve a legitimate purpose for some of the elderly.  Perhaps the inquiry should not reveal the person&#8217;s name by way of inquiry, but only the name and dose of the medication.  That&#8217;s specific enough to serve the purpose of identification, and unspecific enough to absolutely protect individual privacy.</p>
<p>3.  So the New York TIme doesn&#8217;t like ALEC.  That&#8217;s news?  Picking our Walmart for speculation as to how it&#8217;s &#8220;&#8230;lobby and spend campaign contribution money&#8230;&#8221; on various issues &#8220;dovetail&#8221; with &#8220;&#8230;Wal-Mart’s obvious interest in confining sales of anything to established retailers&#8230;&#8221; is the &#8220;job&#8221; of left leaning media purported pundits to discover and reveal (if it&#8217;s newsworthy).  To presume it anyone else&#8217;s business when it is NOT newsworthy is simply to unjustly dignify the intrusiveness of our already out-of-control &#8220;gossip society&#8221;.</p>
<p>Be careful what you ask for&#8230;you just may someday get it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
