<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla&#8217;s big back button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/05/20/mozillas-big-back-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/05/20/mozillas-big-back-button/</link>
	<description>Exclusive outtakes from industry leaders</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BostonPeng</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/05/20/mozillas-big-back-button/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>BostonPeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/05/20/mozillas-big-back-button/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>The larger Back button must be one of the silliest things they've changes, and for one of the most ridiculous reasons (next to, of course, changing the default zoom method to the point where you just can't zoom the way you can in Firefox 2, unless you have an older extension). I'm curious to see how many people get and use themes that at least visually kill the "keyhole."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The larger Back button must be one of the silliest things they&#8217;ve changes, and for one of the most ridiculous reasons (next to, of course, changing the default zoom method to the point where you just can&#8217;t zoom the way you can in Firefox 2, unless you have an older extension). I&#8217;m curious to see how many people get and use themes that at least visually kill the &#8220;keyhole.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
