Summit Notebook

Exclusive outtakes from industry leaders

Canadian energy reaches out to US presidential candidates

By Reuters Staff
June 4, 2008

    By Jeff Jones

    Canada’s energy industry has reached out to both the U.S. Democratic and Republican parties to press its importance as a secure oil and gas supplier as candidates hone their energy policies heading into the November presidential election.
    Canada and the oil-producing province of Alberta have grabbed the attention of many U.S. voters as the oil sands have gained notoriety as a key source of crude imports and as environmentalists warn of the ecological costs.
    “We’ve had conversations with both parties in terms of where energy policy is going to go,” Pierre Alvarez, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, told the Reuters Global Energy Summit.
    “In addition, you’ve started to see that a number of U.S. refiners, the labor unions and others, who are starting to see large investments proceeding in the U.S. to take Canadian crude, are part of that conversation as well,” Alvarez said on the day Barack Obama became the Democrats’ presumptive nominee.
    With oil prices surging above $120 a barrel and Americans paying unprecedented pump prices, encouraging imports from a friendly neighbor with massive reserves seems obvious.
    But Canadian energy executives and politicians were thrown for a loop last year when U.S. lawmakers passed legislation banning the federal government from using fuel sources with higher carbon content than traditional supply, putting oil sands use by big buyers like the military in question.
    Alvarez said that legislation was misunderstood by many, and he has been assured it is not intended to limit oil sands imports.
    “I think U.S. legislators are increasingly aware of the shortages of new supply opportunities, and the oil sands are part of it,” he said.
    “At this point there has been no action in the U.S. that would curtail exports to that market.”
    Environmental groups have intensified efforts to put the spotlight on the impact of frenzied oil sands development on land, air, water and wildlife in northern Alberta. The recent deaths of 500 ducks on a Syncrude Canada tailings pond grabbed headlines around the United States.
    So far, Obama and Republican rival John McCain have said little about Canada’s role in the U.S. energy mix.
    “Once the dust settles we get through the election period, my expectation is we will get a more policy-focused debate as opposed to a politically focused debate,” Alvarez said.

Comments

if a person were to buy canadian stock the goverment takes 15% off the top and then the us gov takes their cut from the top. also canada takes 15% off div. in your rollover. in other words the tax rate on the total is 28% plus 15% 43%off top number.add mass. tax 15@ a 58% total

 

the canadian gov. is looking for the 15%that they load on to the us.that buy their produck oil?

 

The US should drill oil on their own land, instead.

Posted by i8pikachu | Report as abusive
 

Nothing we do in the short span of time is going to ease our pain at the pump. The whole world is sliding ever so quickly toward a economic calamity.

Posted by Kevin | Report as abusive
 

The world is running out of time, and no one seems to have any answers; and we need answers soon or, we will soon face a full blown depression. If the powers to be fail to stabilize the skyrocketing price of crude, most of us will lose our jobs. What then?

Posted by Kevin | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •