<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demoplicans or Repocrats? A look at stock market performance and politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/</link>
	<description>Exclusive outtakes from industry leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Research shows: Only three four year terms have had negative returns. 1973-1981 (Oil crisis) and 2001-2005 (Dubya’s first term).

To that I say: Wait for it, Dubya&#039;s second term isn&#039;t over yet--0nly 1500 Dow points to go, an easy walk in the park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research shows: Only three four year terms have had negative returns. 1973-1981 (Oil crisis) and 2001-2005 (Dubya’s first term).</p>
<p>To that I say: Wait for it, Dubya&#8217;s second term isn&#8217;t over yet&#8211;0nly 1500 Dow points to go, an easy walk in the park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Jorganson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Jorganson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>This brilliant piece of research only confirms the fact that, in spite of protestations by the officeholders, the president has little to do with the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brilliant piece of research only confirms the fact that, in spite of protestations by the officeholders, the president has little to do with the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MICHAEL MORETTI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>MICHAEL MORETTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>THIS WEBSITE IS WAY TO LIBERAL. UNFORTUNATLEY THIS IS THE ONLY NEWS SITE I GET AT WORK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS WEBSITE IS WAY TO LIBERAL. UNFORTUNATLEY THIS IS THE ONLY NEWS SITE I GET AT WORK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Why exclude the &quot;Clinton bubble&quot;? Would a Reagan bubble have been excluded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why exclude the &#8220;Clinton bubble&#8221;? Would a Reagan bubble have been excluded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/06/09/demoplicans-or-repocrats-a-look-at-stock-market-performance-and-politics/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Your assessment doesn&#039;t entail who had control of Congress..remember the Clinton years were prosperous because there was a Republican Majority in Congress..Republicans are better at the Economy when they don&#039;t Spend like they did the last 8 years...Jeanne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your assessment doesn&#8217;t entail who had control of Congress..remember the Clinton years were prosperous because there was a Republican Majority in Congress..Republicans are better at the Economy when they don&#8217;t Spend like they did the last 8 years&#8230;Jeanne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
