<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diller to profitable companies: Lay off the layoffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/</link>
	<description>Exclusive outtakes from industry leaders</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pay cuts instead of layoffs: something insidious this way&#160;comes? - The Curious Capitalist - TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay cuts instead of layoffs: something insidious this way&#160;comes? - The Curious Capitalist - TIME.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] to Nazis (for the record: I am not personally making that comparison). Barry Diller has also had some harsh words for executives of companies that are profitable but nonetheless cutting back on labor costs—i.e., [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Nazis (for the record: I am not personally making that comparison). Barry Diller has also had some harsh words for executives of companies that are profitable but nonetheless cutting back on labor costs—i.e., [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Social Responsibility and No Unnecessary Layoffs &#124; ThoughtRocket Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Social Responsibility and No Unnecessary Layoffs &#124; ThoughtRocket Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-736</guid>
		<description>[...] Chief Executive, Barry Diller, was quoted in Diller to profitable companies: Lay off the layoffs at Huffington Post: “The idea of a company that’s earning money, not losing money, that’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chief Executive, Barry Diller, was quoted in Diller to profitable companies: Lay off the layoffs at Huffington Post: “The idea of a company that’s earning money, not losing money, that’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Diller admonishes business: your obligations extend beyond shareholders &#124; VisionFarm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Diller admonishes business: your obligations extend beyond shareholders &#124; VisionFarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-706</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full interview with Barry Diller on Reuters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full interview with Barry Diller on Reuters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afternoon Reading: The Thain Blame Game &#124; Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Afternoon Reading: The Thain Blame Game &#124; Wall Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-678</guid>
		<description>[...] Summit Notebook has this quote from Barry Diller: &#8220;The idea of a company that’s earning money, not losing money, that’s not, let’s say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Summit Notebook has this quote from Barry Diller: &#8220;The idea of a company that’s earning money, not losing money, that’s not, let’s say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Chimovitz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Chimovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-675</guid>
		<description>The lower income earner is not aware that the really higher income earner pays a smaller percent in taxes.  Did not Warren Buffet say his employees paid more taxes then he did, and they were not aware of that.  Nor was I until I heard that story.  So why should it not be equal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lower income earner is not aware that the really higher income earner pays a smaller percent in taxes.  Did not Warren Buffet say his employees paid more taxes then he did, and they were not aware of that.  Nor was I until I heard that story.  So why should it not be equal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Nota bene: Scholars &#38; Rogues&#8217;s world-famous hot links</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Nota bene: Scholars &#38; Rogues&#8217;s world-famous hot links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-673</guid>
		<description>[...] Clayman, Reuters, Diller to profitable companies: Lay off the layoffs. IAC Chief Executive Barry Diller: &#8220;It&#8217;s not that you don&#8217;t want to earn as much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clayman, Reuters, Diller to profitable companies: Lay off the layoffs. IAC Chief Executive Barry Diller: &#8220;It&#8217;s not that you don&#8217;t want to earn as much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Profitable Companies Lay Off Employees? &#171; City Positive</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Profitable Companies Lay Off Employees? &#171; City Positive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-668</guid>
		<description>[...] Profitable Companies Lay Off&#160;Employees? By citypositive  Barry Diller does not think so. It’s not that you don’t want to earn as much money as you can — it is your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Profitable Companies Lay Off&nbsp;Employees? By citypositive  Barry Diller does not think so. It’s not that you don’t want to earn as much money as you can — it is your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-663</guid>
		<description>RE: Henry Rearden;

Henry your logic is shockingly stupid!  He is talking about 'responsibility' and not an ethic driven by money accumulation to create 'shareholder wealth'.  We gave the keys of our economy to wall street, and they ran the bus right off the cliff.  What do you expect from Wall Street bankers?  I am actually not surprised that you forgot about responsibility, most people have.

&#62;But don’t twist these rightful responsibilities into some idea that those who work harder are beholden to those who do not. 

Ok, we weren't talking about that but it is obviously on your mind.  Not sure how you define work, to me, working hard is working fast-food, mindless jobs where all you do is the same thing over and over again.  That is working hard.  To assume that the world works in a way where the 'hardest' workers got paid the most and the 'laziest' the least, well, you have better drugs then me my friend.  

It's not about who works the hardest at all.  It is about who has the means.  If you have the means, then you have a responsibility to this country to help it in a time of need.  To help-out your fellow man.  But I'm sure that thought doesn't cross your mind too often.

&#62;You are doing this when you talk about Obama’s wealth redistribution plans.

Umm, no, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.  Obama is talking about taxing the rich more, it has nothing to do with 'hard work'.  It has to
do with the fact that we have given tax-cuts to the wealthy.  Now that the nation is in a financial crisis.  I think it is prudent to start having the wealthy pay more.  The bottom line is that hyper-capitalistic behavior managed to do something called 'destroy production capacity'.  Ever hear the saying "don't kill the goose that lays the golden eggs?"  Here 'the goose' represents a healthy economy.  

Think I'm overstating?  The bankers developed a 'financial instrument' called mortgage-backed-securities.  I believe Frank Fabozzi was instrumental in their development.  Anyway, they decided to get as greedy as they could until they had no idea how much their 'financial instruments' were worth.  Hmmm, bankers
who have a nice big vault of 'something' could be gold, could be dirt.  The party ended when AIG found out that that behind door number three was a pile of dirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Henry Rearden;</p>
<p>Henry your logic is shockingly stupid!  He is talking about &#8216;responsibility&#8217; and not an ethic driven by money accumulation to create &#8217;shareholder wealth&#8217;.  We gave the keys of our economy to wall street, and they ran the bus right off the cliff.  What do you expect from Wall Street bankers?  I am actually not surprised that you forgot about responsibility, most people have.</p>
<p>&gt;But don’t twist these rightful responsibilities into some idea that those who work harder are beholden to those who do not. </p>
<p>Ok, we weren&#8217;t talking about that but it is obviously on your mind.  Not sure how you define work, to me, working hard is working fast-food, mindless jobs where all you do is the same thing over and over again.  That is working hard.  To assume that the world works in a way where the &#8216;hardest&#8217; workers got paid the most and the &#8216;laziest&#8217; the least, well, you have better drugs then me my friend.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about who works the hardest at all.  It is about who has the means.  If you have the means, then you have a responsibility to this country to help it in a time of need.  To help-out your fellow man.  But I&#8217;m sure that thought doesn&#8217;t cross your mind too often.</p>
<p>&gt;You are doing this when you talk about Obama’s wealth redistribution plans.</p>
<p>Umm, no, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.  Obama is talking about taxing the rich more, it has nothing to do with &#8216;hard work&#8217;.  It has to<br />
do with the fact that we have given tax-cuts to the wealthy.  Now that the nation is in a financial crisis.  I think it is prudent to start having the wealthy pay more.  The bottom line is that hyper-capitalistic behavior managed to do something called &#8216;destroy production capacity&#8217;.  Ever hear the saying &#8220;don&#8217;t kill the goose that lays the golden eggs?&#8221;  Here &#8216;the goose&#8217; represents a healthy economy.  </p>
<p>Think I&#8217;m overstating?  The bankers developed a &#8216;financial instrument&#8217; called mortgage-backed-securities.  I believe Frank Fabozzi was instrumental in their development.  Anyway, they decided to get as greedy as they could until they had no idea how much their &#8216;financial instruments&#8217; were worth.  Hmmm, bankers<br />
who have a nice big vault of &#8217;something&#8217; could be gold, could be dirt.  The party ended when AIG found out that that behind door number three was a pile of dirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaving Adobe After 10 Years -- URBEINGRECORDED</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaving Adobe After 10 Years -- URBEINGRECORDED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-660</guid>
		<description>[...] global economic paradigm. To that end, I&#8217;ll leave you with the recent words of IAC chief exec Barry Diller  regarding the spate of US workforce layoffs:  The idea of a company that’s earning money, not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] global economic paradigm. To that end, I&#8217;ll leave you with the recent words of IAC chief exec Barry Diller  regarding the spate of US workforce layoffs:  The idea of a company that’s earning money, not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/2008/12/04/diller-to-profitable-companies-lay-off-the-layoffs/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/?p=2365#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Who does this guy think he is, James Taggart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who does this guy think he is, James Taggart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
