Rockwell Collins CEO: ex-fighter pilot sees need for pilotless aircraft

December 15, 2009

On the surface, it would appear that a fighter pilot would have little interest in a remotely piloted aircraft, which more and more are being used in wars for reconnaissance and firing missiles.

It isn’t too big a leap to wonder whether in the future perhaps drones will take away jobs from fighter pilots.

AERO-ARMS-SUMMIT/But Rockwell Collins Chief Executive Officer Clay Jones, a former fighter pilot, says there is room for both.

“Technology marches on. Obviously I have a great affinity for keeping a human in the loop. And I think a human will always be in the loop in some aircraft because there are certain missions that require a human to make judgments, and to do what only a human being can do, in the say heat of battle,” he said in an interview at the Reuters Aerospace and Defense Summit.

“I mean it’s hard to see a UAV having enough situational awareness to do a dogfight, as an example,” Jones said. “However, unmanned aerial vehicles have certainly proven their merit in a number of missions, like reconnaissance.”

“So I think that there’s a clear opportunity for both types of systems to exist in the force structure,” Jones said.

Jones flew F-4 and F-15 fighter jets from 1972 to 1979 in the post-Vietnam period, he did not see combat. He still very much has the straight-shouldered posture of a fighter pilot and can’t hide his delight at how “very, very cool” the holographic image looks on the helmet visor of the F-35 which with the turn of the head will guide the radar. “Real Buck Rogers stuff,” he enthused.

“Now do I rue the day when we can’t enjoy the wonders of flight as a human being, absolutely I do, but you’re a realist, you have to recognize where technology brings advantages and use that technology to your benefit.”

Photo credit: Reuters/Molly Riley (Jones at Reuters summit)

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see