Tales from the Trail

Gay marriage, right to hunt among November U.S. ballot initiatives

August 7, 2008

gay-marriage.jpgDALLAS – When Americans vote for a new president on Nov. 4, many will also be asked to have their say on local issues and proposed state constitutional amendments.

Much of the attention has been focused on the attempts to ban gay marriage in California and Florida, which we have written about elsewhere.

Similar initiatives in 2004 were seen as crucial to President George W. Bush’s re-election victory as they energized the Republican Party’s conservative evangelical base.  Propositions are initiated locally people who collect enough signatures to have them put on the ballot. If passed by voters they carry the force of law.

Ballotwatch, which is part of the Initiative & Referendum Institute at the University of Southern California, released a preview Thursday of the initiatives that will coincide with this year’s presidential battle between Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama.

It said that as of early August, voters in 30 states are set to decide on 112 ballot propositions and the number is likely to grow as several states are still verifying signatures and some legislatures are considering additional measures. (In 2004 there were 162 propositions and 204 in the 2006 mid-term elections).

“The big story for ballot propositions this year is the surge of social issues. The tax and spending issues that normally dominate initiatives and referendums are taking a back seat to a diverse collection of social issues,” it says in its report.

These also include an anti-abortion rights measure in South Dakota and attempts to roll back affirmative action in Colorado, which will keep the issue of race on the boil.

Animal rights and welfare issues have also emerged in a big way this year.

In Oklahoma, State Question 742 will seek to establish a state constitutional right to hunt and fish — a “pre-emptive” strike against the animal rights crowd.

huntinghuck.jpg

Given Obama’s famous comments about rural voters clinging to their guns, the measure is likely to benefit McCain, though Oklahoma is already pretty solidly Republican.

In Alaska, ballot measure 2 will ask voters to ban the aerial hunting of bears, wolves and wolverines — a measure sure to excite both sides of the issue. (And shock a lot of people who don’t realize that you can shoot wolves from planes?)wolves.jpg

And in Massachusetts, voters will be asked to decriminalize marijuana.

The ballot measures offer a good look at the intersect of politics and culture in America — and just how polarized society is.

Click here for more Reuters 2008 campaign coverage.

Photo credit: Top Reuters/Erin Siegel (Couple after marriage in June); Middle Reuters/Keith Bedford (Hunters in December); and Bottom Reuters/Ho New (Wolves in February)

Comments
2 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Great. I’m all for states rights and it looks like the states are picking up the initiative since our federal government under the republicans have been unwilling to tackle so many issues. More power to the states! If you don’t like the laws where you live then move. It won’t be long until everything from euthansia, decrimialization of marijuana, illegal immigrants, abortion, gay marriage, polygamy, and other issues will find a welcome home in one state or another. Welcome to the Un-united States of America, its going to be a great century.

Posted by Neal | Report as abusive
 

Neal is right, but the Fed keeps persecuting medical marijuana patients, in spite of State laws. We need NATIONAL ballot initiatives to make real the “First Principal” of the U.S.: “The People are Sovereign.”

The best project for better and national initiatives is led by former Sen. Mike Gravel, and YOU can vote to ratify it, just as citizens ratified the Constitution at the Conventions: http://Vote.org

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/