<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary on the Hill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-387279</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=14914#comment-387279</guid>
		<description>It is possible 9/11 would not have happened had Clinton done his job. Fortunately for America, it didn&#039;t happen on Clinton&#039;s watch. Otherwise, more attacks would have followed. Oh, I forgot, that was the second time the World Trade Center was bombed. The first was during the Clinton presidency.

So, the Clinton&#039;s did nothing swell in a foreign policy arena. Confirming Hillary as Secretary of State (SOS), will be just that an SOS for the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible 9/11 would not have happened had Clinton done his job. Fortunately for America, it didn&#8217;t happen on Clinton&#8217;s watch. Otherwise, more attacks would have followed. Oh, I forgot, that was the second time the World Trade Center was bombed. The first was during the Clinton presidency.</p>
<p>So, the Clinton&#8217;s did nothing swell in a foreign policy arena. Confirming Hillary as Secretary of State (SOS), will be just that an SOS for the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-387263</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=14914#comment-387263</guid>
		<description>I am amazed Americans support this woman. No doubt she and her husband have hurt American tremendously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed Americans support this woman. No doubt she and her husband have hurt American tremendously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-387259</link>
		<dc:creator>Mun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=14914#comment-387259</guid>
		<description>In what way can one compare being a First Lady to being the Secretary of State?  Though I am not a particular fan of Hilary Clinton myself, I do not see how using the arugment that she was the first lady is relevant to  wether or not she she is qualified to be the Secretary of State.  A better argument is to point to wether she has shown that is capable of performing the duties of this job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way can one compare being a First Lady to being the Secretary of State?  Though I am not a particular fan of Hilary Clinton myself, I do not see how using the arugment that she was the first lady is relevant to  wether or not she she is qualified to be the Secretary of State.  A better argument is to point to wether she has shown that is capable of performing the duties of this job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-387251</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=14914#comment-387251</guid>
		<description>The democrats would not confirm her if she was a republican. But they are going to minimize the conflict of interest and confirm her anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The democrats would not confirm her if she was a republican. But they are going to minimize the conflict of interest and confirm her anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sang</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/01/14/hillary-on-the-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-387242</link>
		<dc:creator>Sang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=14914#comment-387242</guid>
		<description>I think Clinton was a First Lady once,    so she should remain in the Senate.    She has too much greed on her hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Clinton was a First Lady once,    so she should remain in the Senate.    She has too much greed on her hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
