Comments on: Good Friday: Obama discusses economy http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/04/10/good-friday-obama-discusses-economy/ Tracking U.S. politics Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:04:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: TC http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/04/10/good-friday-obama-discusses-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-390837 TC Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:45:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=17028#comment-390837 You missed the point Anubis. However, it doesn't matter. Anyway, our comments have as much to do with the article as your comment. You missed the point Anubis. However, it doesn’t matter.

Anyway, our comments have as much to do with the article as your comment.

]]> By: Anubis http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/04/10/good-friday-obama-discusses-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-390829 Anubis Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:25:14 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=17028#comment-390829 TC and Brian, the New York Times beat the drums for war after 911. This is hardly a left leaning position. The previous right leaning government we just replaced had prosecutors withholding evidence and put known liars on the stand in the Ted Stevens trial. The same group of attorneys did the same thing in a dozen Guantanamo trials. I would ascribe such behavior as a product of Despotism, not conservatism or liberalism. I believe the U.S. is a fascist/oligarchic state. There is no far left in this country. (I sometimes think there is no right, just authoritarian rule) Reuters is an international news service so it should be no surprise that the blogs and their content reflect more liberal positions as the world is far more liberal than the U.S.. Now to the point, what does either of your commentaries have to do with with the article titled "Obama discusses economy"? TC and Brian, the New York Times beat the drums for war after 911. This is hardly a left leaning position. The previous right leaning government we just replaced had prosecutors withholding evidence and put known liars on the stand in the Ted Stevens trial. The same group of attorneys did the same thing in a dozen Guantanamo trials. I would ascribe such behavior as a product of Despotism, not conservatism or liberalism.

I believe the U.S. is a fascist/oligarchic state. There is no far left in this country. (I sometimes think there is no right, just authoritarian rule) Reuters is an international news service so it should be no surprise that the blogs and their content reflect more liberal positions as the world is far more liberal than the U.S..

Now to the point, what does either of your commentaries have to do with with the article titled “Obama discusses economy”?

]]> By: TC http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/04/10/good-friday-obama-discusses-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-390822 TC Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:12:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=17028#comment-390822 Exactly Brian! I notice how anyone with a far left viewpoint can say what they want about someone with a conservative viewpoint. However, when I try to provide a conservative counterargument, it often doesn't get posted. In a free society, that is a travesty. Exactly Brian! I notice how anyone with a far left viewpoint can say what they want about someone with a conservative viewpoint. However, when I try to provide a conservative counterargument, it often doesn’t get posted.

In a free society, that is a travesty.

]]> By: brian lee http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/04/10/good-friday-obama-discusses-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-390816 brian lee Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:32:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=17028#comment-390816 to reuters,to try and present the conservative point of view through your organization is like being a christian in china ,you can participate providing you register, or follow the party line.the alternative to the liberal agenda is only tolerated with you, providing if it is only a small percentage of the total posting.this is obvious if you analyse recent contributions to the blogs ,that is why organizations like the new york times are becoming extinct,a one sided argument is boring.so cut down on the censorship of legitimate conservative debate. to reuters,to try and present the conservative point of view through your organization is like being a christian in china ,you can participate providing you register, or follow the party line.the alternative to the liberal agenda is only tolerated with you, providing if it is only a small percentage of the total posting.this is obvious if you analyse recent contributions to the blogs ,that is why organizations like the new york times are becoming extinct,a one sided argument is boring.so cut down on the censorship of legitimate conservative debate.

]]>