Tales from the Trail

The First Draft: Could Obama’s Olympic sprint be a preview of a Copenhagen climate trip?

October 5, 2009

THAILAND/OK, so President Barack Obama’s lightning jaunt to Copenhagen last week was less than successful. Even with Oprah along, the Cheerleader-in-Chief couldn’t clinch the deal for Chicago to host the 2016 Olympics. It happens.

But now that he knows the way to Denmark, might the American president consider arguing the U.S. case at international climate meetings in Copenhagen in December? The White House said he might, if other heads of state showed up.

“Right now you’ve got a meeting that’s set up for a level not at the head of state level,” presidential spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One last week. “If it got switched, we would certainly look at coming.”

Those climate talks might need a bit of a boost from the United States. White House climate czarina Carol Browner has said it’s unlikely Obama will be able to sign any U.S. legislation to curb climate change before the December meeting. And that sets up a familiar Catch-22: if there’s no U.S. law in place before Copenhagen climate talks, can the United States commit to anything? And if there IS a U.S. law in place, does the United States have the flexibility to maneuver in these international negotiations?

Climate negotiators already know the answer to the first part of that conundrum; they agreed to the Kyoto Protocol without backing from the U.S. Congress and came home to find no support for this 1997 carbon-capping deal. The United States is still the only industrialized nation not to ratify it.

CLIMATE/After the Olympic disappointment — Chicago was the first city of the final four to be cut from the running; Rio won — is Obama’s presence something that U.S. climate negotiators actually want? The global environmental community cheered his election last year after eight years of the George W. Bush administration, but he may not be the rock star on climate that he was then.

And let’s just face it: arriving at climate change talks aboard a fuel hog like Air Force One could send a mixed message — unless the White House commits to offsetting the big plane’s emissions by investing in windmills or tree-planting in a friendly developing country.

So today’s question: would an Obama visit to the Copenhagen climate talks help or hurt the chances for a global deal? Let us know what you think.

Photo credits: REUTERS/Chaiwat Subprasom (demonstration against Barack Obama and other world leaders outside UN climate change talks in Bangkok, Oct 5, 2009)

REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton (Obama shakes U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon after addressing a U.N. summit on climate change, Sept 22, 2009)

Comments
6 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

The White House/Obama Administration blunder of ‘Olympic’ proportion last week in Copenhagen represents careless impulsive action, wasted political capital and huge ‘loss of face’ in the international and diplomatic community.

Now, with the anticipated failure of the U.S. to deliver a ‘rational’ Climate and Energy Deal in December, the President will basically be traveling to Copenhagen in December to ‘drop the other shoe’.

- A disappointingly squandered opportunity for American leadership and a set-back for geo-strategic competitiveness in a yet-to-be realized climate-compliant global marketplace.

- The Phoenix Protocol™
_

 

Well, considering the earth has not warmed at all for a decade and has actually been cooling for the last 8 years, why do we need a carbon agreement? Global warming is a hoax. Why else would they change the name from “global warming” to “climate change”? THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING. Deal with it. Losers..

Posted by Brian | Report as abusive
 

I see this author reports on climate issues. I ask the author personally, have you been reporting about how the earth has been cooling for the last 8 years? If not, why not? Did you know that just 10,000 years ago New York was under a sheet of ice one mile thick? Were there cars back then? How did that ice melt? The earth warms and cools and has been since the beginning of time. Step outside once and a while and you can experience nature firsthand not through the eyes of Al Gore and your computer.

Posted by Brian | Report as abusive
 

Well, you know, dude, about global warming being a hoax. Smokers used to claim that smoking being harmful was a hoax. Guess what, it isn’t. Just ask them. Oh, that’s right, you can’t. THEY ARE DEAD!

Posted by Laz | Report as abusive
 

President Obama should attend Copenhagen with an ambitious agenda that announces his intentions to address climate change in the US, leading the way. If he does not, he will be considered the fool of the century! Shows up to rally support for an Olympic game but cannot rally a clean burning vehicle to address global support for climate change as the leader of the that world!

Posted by Amy | Report as abusive
 

“Global Warming” is a global con pertetrated to inflict high taxes, penalty fees, and higher utility bills on the population with the sole purpose of making a select few filthy rich.

Posted by Glenn | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/