<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Draft: White House takes a lonely road to openness on Crasher-gate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberated</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-408613</link>
		<dc:creator>liberated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-408613</guid>
		<description>How does the couple slipping into the Whitehouse, uninvited, compare to the war,
economy, health care, and the climate.  He has already admitted it was a security blunder, and  has been open about ALL of it!!  The decision was not to try to jail them and why!! How much more &quot;open&quot; can you get for God&#039;s sake?!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the couple slipping into the Whitehouse, uninvited, compare to the war,<br />
economy, health care, and the climate.  He has already admitted it was a security blunder, and  has been open about ALL of it!!  The decision was not to try to jail them and why!! How much more &#8220;open&#8221; can you get for God&#8217;s sake?!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddieblack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-405310</link>
		<dc:creator>eddieblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-405310</guid>
		<description>If the administration cannot be honest about a White House security blunder, then we know the truth will not be forthcoming about progress and developments on the war, economy, health care and the climate.

Perhaps instead of covering up or hanging people out to dry for incompetence, Presidents and other government officials should hire qualified people instead of appointing political cronies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the administration cannot be honest about a White House security blunder, then we know the truth will not be forthcoming about progress and developments on the war, economy, health care and the climate.</p>
<p>Perhaps instead of covering up or hanging people out to dry for incompetence, Presidents and other government officials should hire qualified people instead of appointing political cronies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoavatara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-405308</link>
		<dc:creator>neoavatara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-405308</guid>
		<description>This is getting to be a bad habit for this administration. I thought the Bush Administration was secretive, but protecting a social secretary? Next, their dog will be under executive privilege. It is absurd. So much for the openness of this administration. I thought they would be different.

http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=9030</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting to be a bad habit for this administration. I thought the Bush Administration was secretive, but protecting a social secretary? Next, their dog will be under executive privilege. It is absurd. So much for the openness of this administration. I thought they would be different.</p>
<p><a href='http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=9030'>http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=9030</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoavatara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-405307</link>
		<dc:creator>neoavatara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-405307</guid>
		<description>This is getting to be a bad habit for this administration.  I thought the Bush Administration was secretive, but protecting a social secretary?  Next, their dog will be under executive privilege.  It is absurd.  So much for the openness of this administration.  I thought they would be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting to be a bad habit for this administration.  I thought the Bush Administration was secretive, but protecting a social secretary?  Next, their dog will be under executive privilege.  It is absurd.  So much for the openness of this administration.  I thought they would be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-405216</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-405216</guid>
		<description>Desiree Rogers, from Chicago, is a long time member of the Obama machine. She is such a high ranking and well respected member of the royal family she didn&#039;t attend the gala affair as an employee. Instead of doing her job she concidered herself as one of the guests and sat herself at one of the tables. That&#039;s why the White House is protecting her from testifing before Congress. In Chicago you protect your own. So much for protocal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desiree Rogers, from Chicago, is a long time member of the Obama machine. She is such a high ranking and well respected member of the royal family she didn&#8217;t attend the gala affair as an employee. Instead of doing her job she concidered herself as one of the guests and sat herself at one of the tables. That&#8217;s why the White House is protecting her from testifing before Congress. In Chicago you protect your own. So much for protocal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-405204</link>
		<dc:creator>eman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-405204</guid>
		<description>jarret  is a  currupt and complete imbecile  !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jarret  is a  currupt and complete imbecile  !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/12/03/the-first-draft-white-house-takes-a-lonely-road-to-openness-on-crasher-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-405202</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=22819#comment-405202</guid>
		<description>Smells of cover-up to me.  What arrogance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smells of cover-up to me.  What arrogance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
