Comments on: Amidst the shivering in Washington, the case for global warming

By: FRDuplantier

FRDuplantier — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:58:54 +0000

Pay tribute to Al Gore, the father of the global warming hoax, by sending “Fraudster the Snowman” (http://politickles.com/blog/?p=4008) to all your friends.

By: drkcloud

drkcloud — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:49:29 +0000

Yellow105 – Don’t feel bad, we can’t all be brilliant…

Keep on reading though, it will get easier.

By: Yellow105

Yellow105 — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:06:53 +0000

Well “10hawks”, it looks like Reuters has ONE stupid reader…

By: neoavatara

neoavatara — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:02:16 +0000

We need better and more reliable science. So much of the science on global warming has found to be artifactual or downright fraudulent, is it no wonder that the bulk of Americans don’t believe in it?

Americans are a reasonable people. If you give them facts, and are honest, they will believe you. But right now, that is not what is happening.

http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=9867

By: 10hawks

10hawks — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:41:22 +0000

More phony propaganda from Reuters, based on the phony “concensus” based on
phony climate “science”. Imagine that your readers are not stupid, please.

By: drewbie

drewbie — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:18:12 +0000

Benny-
Your explanation of how vocano CO2 isn’t as significant as fossiil fuel CO2 doesn’t make sense. The concentration of CO2 isn’t what (theoretically) causes warming, it’s the parts per billion (ppb). Removing oxygen from the atmosphere doesn’t directly affect climate.

By: drewbie

drewbie — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:14:12 +0000

The Earth is warmer today than it was 100 years ago. That much cannot be disputed.

I’ve looked at the temperture data, and despite Al Gore’s very dramatic graphs, I don’t see a correlation to [CO2]. Since 1900, [CO2] has gone no where but up, while tempertures have gone all over the place, and been relatively stable for the last 12 years. (See the charts yourself here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Instru mental_Temperature_Record.png )

Instead of trying in vain to stop the changing climate, I think policy should focus exclusivly on preparing for the new climate.

By: waveonshore

waveonshore — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:11:10 +0000

If I was dead at the side of the road there are those who would deny that I existed, let alone that I was dead! Fools like to believe what the choose rather than what facts say. Climate change is happening! To dismiss changes because of politics is absurd and will only speed a worsening situation.

By: russdward357

russdward357 — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:59:35 +0000

Most people fail to recognize the real absurdities in this debate. They are not based on the positions people take whether climate change is real or not. They are based on the completely irrational ways in which people and governments are reacting to the possible reality.

By: aerologycom

aerologycom — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:46:49 +0000

http://www.aerology.com/national.aspx
Has a weather forecast based on repeating cycles in the weather (natural analog) that shows the difference between the past three cycles just like this one, in all respects except the solar minimum activity in this the current cycle, as a change from the past three in which the sun was closer to the peaks in solar activity.

The difference clearly shows the more southern location of the jet streams, now as opposed to the past three cycles. The activity levels are about the same as before, so there is no “unprecedented new pattern” just further South than usual.

Most of the “Natural variability in the weather”, that averages out to be “Climate” is the result of repeating patterns in the influences of the movement of the planets around the center of mass of the solar system. Which affects the solar output and sunspot cycles that drives the periodic changes in the “climate”.

CO2 has nothing to do with it, it is all about cap and fraud, tax and spend your money.