Comments on: Lockbox may be making a political comeback Tracking U.S. politics Wed, 16 Nov 2016 03:39:51 +0000 hourly 1 By: GetpIaning Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:42:17 +0000 TC – Not only did Gore win by 540,000 recorded votes in 2000…he won by 5-7 million. First there was the 2000 Judicial Coup and the long-running media con that Bush really did win Florida, although Gore won nationally by 540,000 votes. It wasn’t even the close race the media has misled you to believe. Gore did much, much better than his official recorded vote, nationally as well as in Florida.

Here is the 1988-2008 unadjusted state exit poll data and the 1988-2008 State and National True Vote Models. Both are Google Doc spreadsheet workbooks.  /11/21/unadjusted-state-exit-polls-indi cate-that-al-gore-won-a-mini-landslide-i n-2000/

Al Gore won the unadjusted state exit polls by 50.8% to 44.4%, a 6 MILLION VOTE MARGIN compared to the 540,000 recorded. There were nearly 6 MILLION UNCOUNTED Gore votes.

The True Vote Model, based on 1996 and 2000 votes cast, was a close match to Gore’s exit poll share. He had a 50.0% True Vote share assuming he had 75% of 8 million returning 1996 voters, whose ballots for Clinton were uncounted, and 75% of 6 million uncounted votes in 2000.

Gore won the unadjusted exit poll in the following 13 states:

But all flipped to Bush. Gore would have won the election if he held just ONE of them. The election was stolen. Gore won his home state of TN as well as FL. He even won the exit poll in TX, Bush’s home state, by 4%. But I bet you never knew that.

The exit poll/recorded vote margin discrepancy exceeded 10% in 10 states:

But that theft was just a prologue of what was to come in 2004 and 2008.

In 2004, Kerry won the True Vote in a landslide – by nearly 10 million votes. The election was stolen again. The margin discrepancy exceeded 10% in 15 states: VT DE AK CT SC VA NJ HI NH MS PA UT MN NM OH

And in 2008, Obama’s landslide was even larger. He did much, much better than his recorded 9.5 million vote margin. The 10% margin discrepancy was exceeded in an astounding 28 states.

Sorry to burst your Fox News bubble, but those are the facts.

By: Yellow105 Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:05:32 +0000 Yep, their lying is pathological.

By: TyC Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:06:44 +0000 So, what’s the title of the book I am talking about getplaning?

No, there was no mention of the Supreme Court as being the vote denying obstacle to Gore losing the election.

It was clearly for a lack of votes which Dick Gephardt and the democrats found when they did a complete recount six months after the election. Bush won every single recount.

Sorry to disappoint you, but that’s a fact.

Doesn’t really matter anyway. Gore lost and Bush won. End of story.

By: GetpIaning Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:48:57 +0000 Yellow105-
TC’s talking point that Gore and his team knew they didn’t have the votes is their universal argument. But, as usual, they edit the text to suit their ideology.

What the book actually says is, Gore and his team knew they didn’t have the votes on the Supreme Court.

Their lying is pathological, isn’t it.

By: Yellow105 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:59:39 +0000 It never ceases to amaze me how easily you lie, TyC.
You never read Gore’s book, if you did, you would know he never says any such thing.

The Bush vs Gore argument is old and worn out. But the world knows Gore had the votes, but the courts stopped the count. The world knows that the Bush years were nothing but tax cuts for the rich, and death and destruction for everyone else.

By: TyC Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:44:44 +0000 There’s the yellow troll again…right on cue…

Anyway, in the Gore book he and his team knew they didn’t have the votes.

Bush did certainly win the election and it is good the world didn’t have to endure his presidency which would have surely been a disaster making every other president, Carter included look like winners. Obama is proving this assertion correct….42 percent approval rating and falling.

You’ve been quiet Yellow. You empty vessels are like that…Have a nice day.

I really don’t have time for your harassment.

By: Yellow105 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:20:50 +0000 Everyone in the world knows Gore had the majority of votes. The trick was getting those votes thrown out, which is how Bush “won” the election.

Later examinations of the ballots from Florida show that Gore had more votes, and by a large margin, but this headline was overshadowed by 9-11.

Bush won, Gore lost, and the world is still trying to “get over it.”

By: TyC Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:12:41 +0000 borisjimbo.

So how exactly did Gore get cheated out of the White House?

Every single recount (even the one led 6 months later by Dick Gephardt and the democrats) showed Bush the winner.

Even in a book about Gore and the recount (sorry the title slips my mind at the moment) the Gore “team” knew the odds were against them picking up a majority of votes to overturn the election results. So Gore acknowledged he lost the election.

Gore was the one who tried to cheat his way into the White House.

By: borisjimbo Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:31:23 +0000 I guess better late than never, but let’s remind people it was the man who was cheated out of the White House who first pushed this idea.