Humor in the hearing room

June 30, 2010

kaganOn day-two of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearing, she didn’t reveal much about her specific views on a wide range of issues over nine hours.

But now we know the U.S. Solicitor General can be funny. Very funny.

Kagan repeatedly disarmed lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary panel with a quick sense of humor.

Kagan, who as U.S.  Solicitor General currently represents the government in cases before the Supreme Court, refused to take the bait when Arizona Republican Jon Kyl asked if she agreed with complaints that the court had favored corporate interests in recent rulings.

“I would not want to characterize the current court in any way — I hope one day to join it,” Kagan said.

“And they said you weren’t political,” Kyl responded to laughter from Kagan and the audience.

Asked by South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham where she was on Christmas Day, when a failed plane bombing threatened U.S. lives.

“Like all Jews, I was probably in a Chinese restaurant,” Kagan said, drawing more laughter in the hearing room.

Should Supreme Court proceedings be televised? Kagan said it would be “a terrific thing” to have cameras in the court.

“The issues are important ones … I mean, some of them will put you to sleep,” she said to laughs.

“It means I’d have to get my hair done more often,” Kagan said to Pennsylvania Democrat Arlen Specter.

“Let me commend you on that last comment, and I say that seriously,” Specter said. You have shown a really admirable sense of humor, and I think that is really important.”

Click here for more Reuters political news

Photo Credit: REUTERS/Jason Reed (Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan at her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing June 29, 2010)


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

We are not looking for comic relief in the Supreme Court. We are looking for judicial experience and a true American. Not one that is against everything we stand for.

Posted by pmcgall64 | Report as abusive

I find nothing humerous about a nominee who thinks the Commerce Clause can be used to legitimately ban books, movies, or political ads in certain cases.

Neither do I find her ban on military recruiters on her campus humerous.

Not just NO, but &%$@&$$ NO!!!!

Posted by TxCharlie | Report as abusive

Illiterate teabagger morons, Kagan will be confirmed, and no amount of idiotic hyperbole can stop it.

Posted by Yellow105 | Report as abusive