<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Extra &#8211; Go figure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellow105</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-413265</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow105</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=32168#comment-413265</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks like you are wrong here, TyC. If they voted that way to save their jobs, it worked, they kept their jobs. And the ones who voted against HCR lost their jobs. Obviously, voters were in favor of HCR. You fail again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks like you are wrong here, TyC. If they voted that way to save their jobs, it worked, they kept their jobs. And the ones who voted against HCR lost their jobs. Obviously, voters were in favor of HCR. You fail again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TyC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-412347</link>
		<dc:creator>TyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=32168#comment-412347</guid>
		<description>Yeah, dumb...

They voted that way to try to save their jobs. You are the one with dumb hair.

The progressive democrats lost in a big way and you can spin it any way you want to. 

Nice try...You always spin and you are always wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, dumb&#8230;</p>
<p>They voted that way to try to save their jobs. You are the one with dumb hair.</p>
<p>The progressive democrats lost in a big way and you can spin it any way you want to. </p>
<p>Nice try&#8230;You always spin and you are always wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetpIaning</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-412266</link>
		<dc:creator>GetpIaning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=32168#comment-412266</guid>
		<description>LOL, sometimes you are just dumber than a sack of hair...Of the 39 Democrats voted against health care reform, 27 of them lost. If the Democrats who distanced themselves from their party by bashing Nancy Pelosi, all of them lost. Almost every Democrat who voted against unemployment benefit extensions lost. In other words, it was conservatives who were overwhelmingly thrown out of office, not progressives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, sometimes you are just dumber than a sack of hair&#8230;Of the 39 Democrats voted against health care reform, 27 of them lost. If the Democrats who distanced themselves from their party by bashing Nancy Pelosi, all of them lost. Almost every Democrat who voted against unemployment benefit extensions lost. In other words, it was conservatives who were overwhelmingly thrown out of office, not progressives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TyC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-412227</link>
		<dc:creator>TyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=32168#comment-412227</guid>
		<description>Yeah, nice theory.

The American people clearly do not support the radical agenda of Obama or the members of the lame duck congress who were thrown out of office.

Keep trying...people with your progressive viewpoint clearly do not represent the views of the majority of the American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, nice theory.</p>
<p>The American people clearly do not support the radical agenda of Obama or the members of the lame duck congress who were thrown out of office.</p>
<p>Keep trying&#8230;people with your progressive viewpoint clearly do not represent the views of the majority of the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellow105</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/12/02/washington-extra-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-412163</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow105</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/?p=32168#comment-412163</guid>
		<description>53 percent of Americans want the Bush-era tax cuts extended only for households earning less than $250,000 per year. That roughly matches the proposal put forth by the White House, which wants to extend the cuts only for incomes less than $250,000 for families and $200,000 for individuals.

Just 26 percent of Americans say they support extending the cuts for all Americans, even those earning above the $250,000 level, which is the GOP proposal. So Republicans ARE listening to the American people, they just aren&#039;t listening to the vast MAJORITY of American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53 percent of Americans want the Bush-era tax cuts extended only for households earning less than $250,000 per year. That roughly matches the proposal put forth by the White House, which wants to extend the cuts only for incomes less than $250,000 for families and $200,000 for individuals.</p>
<p>Just 26 percent of Americans say they support extending the cuts for all Americans, even those earning above the $250,000 level, which is the GOP proposal. So Republicans ARE listening to the American people, they just aren&#8217;t listening to the vast MAJORITY of American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
