URL mischief crops up on the campaign front

May 6, 2011

It’s early in the 2012 presidential election campaign, but dirty tricks are alive and well, at least on the Internet.

In the days after President Barack Obama announced the killing of Osama bin Laden, someone bought a new Internet URL, “GutsyCall.com,” and set it to redirect to Obama’s BarackObama.com campaign re-election website. The reference was to reports that John Brennan, a White House counterterrorism adviser, had characterized Obama’s order to send troops after bin Laden as “one of the most gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory.”

The connection was seized upon by conservative-leaning media, which portrayed it as an attempt by campaign officials to politicize bin Laden’s death despite their assertions that they did not intend to do so. The problem with that assertion? The campaign and the Democratic National Committee insisted they had nothing to do with the URL and knew nothing about it.

Aides at the DNC were angry that writers ran stories on the link without looking into who was behind it. One worker in new media at the party headquarters struck back with some URL redirection of his own. He bought another URL — www.weeklyNOstandards.com — that redirected readers to the homepage of The Weekly Standard, which had written about the URL. The point of buying the URL was to show how easy it is for anyone to buy one and redirect it to another site, and to keep the story from spreading, the DNC said.

The Weekly Standard in turn said it spent yet another $8.93 to buy a new URL — www.DNCcrybabies.com — which on Friday afternoon at least was still redirecting readers to democrats.org, the DNC’s homepage.

“Consider it our little contribution to the slow economic recovery,” the Weekly Standard wrote on its website.

Photo credit: Obama speaks to troops at Fort Campbell in Kentucky, where he privately thanked some members of the elite special forces team involved in the raid that killed bin Laden. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

This entire exchange illustrates the juvenile delinquency that has replaced journalism in the age of bloggers. We need credentialed, trained journalist who are monitored for ethical and professional behavior and punished by their employers and sanctioned by a professional association when they fail to live up to those standards.

For a brief period in the mid-20th century, journalism was a profession, not a sport or hobby. As a society, we suffer for the loss of that profession. Sad.

Posted by jimvw2 | Report as abusive

The url www.GutsyCall.com now points to the twitter page of Weekly Standard deputy online editor Daniel Halper who originally speculated that the Obama 2012 Campaign had purchased the url.

In addition, www.GutsyCall.NET now points to the Wikipedia page for Journalism Ethics and Standards. Owned!

Posted by GutsyCall2012 | Report as abusive