<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters Washington Extra &#8211; Panetta&#8217;s pain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2012/01/26/reuters-washington-extra-panettas-pain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2012/01/26/reuters-washington-extra-panettas-pain/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:12:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SocalClimber70</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2012/01/26/reuters-washington-extra-panettas-pain/comment-page-1/#comment-422966</link>
		<dc:creator>SocalClimber70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/?p=38819#comment-422966</guid>
		<description>Panetta, is offering to cut $500 billion over 10 years. Using second grade mathematics, that drops military spend by $50 billion per year. That&#039;s not enough. Look at pre-Iraq levels, we should be below that number ($300 billion / year) if we want our military spend to be anywhere close to what other countries spend. Panetta just insulted us with his offer to &quot;cut&quot; military spending.  If he had offered $4 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years then we would be in the right ballpark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panetta, is offering to cut $500 billion over 10 years. Using second grade mathematics, that drops military spend by $50 billion per year. That&#8217;s not enough. Look at pre-Iraq levels, we should be below that number ($300 billion / year) if we want our military spend to be anywhere close to what other countries spend. Panetta just insulted us with his offer to &#8220;cut&#8221; military spending.  If he had offered $4 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years then we would be in the right ballpark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
