Will Election 2012 be another Florida 2000?

June 8, 2012

 

The 2008 U.S. presidential election was the first in 12 years in which large numbers of Americans did not believe the result was unfairly influenced by the machinations of politically biased state election officials. But it was also the first in a dozen years that was not close, as Democrat Barack Obama cruised to a blowout victory over Republican John McCain.

With 2012 shaping up to be another tight contest, experts say controversy is likely this year, especially given that 33 of the 50 state election authorities are led by partisan politicians, who are free to work for candidates’ campaigns. 

“People don’t pay attention to problems of partisanship until it’s too late,” said Richard Hasen, an elections law specialist at the University of California-Irvine.

There has already been election controversy this year. Republicans and Democrats have been fighting for months over voter identification laws that Republicans say are necessary to prevent fraud, and Democrats contend are efforts to make it harder for poorer voters and members of minorities – who tend to vote Democratic – to cast ballots.

In Florida, election officials appointed by the state’s Republican governor are in a fight with the Department of Justice over their effort to purge the voter rolls of non-citizens, an effort federal authorities contend unfairly targets members of minority groups.  

And last month, Arizona’s secretary of state, who is also Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s campaign co-chairman, threatened to keep Obama’s name off the state ballot on Nov. 6 unless officials in Hawaii provided proof that Obama was born in their state. They did so, and Republican Ken Bennett added Obama’s name, but he was criticized for reviving discredited speculation that Obama, the first black U.S. president, was born in Africa, and thus ineligible to hold the office.

Americans lost faith in the U.S. political system after controversies surrounding the 2004 and 2000 elections.

In 2004, incumbent Republican President George W. Bush’s re-election hinged on his victory in Ohio, where the top election official, Republican Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, was a co-chairman of his  campaign. Some Democrats insisted that Blackwell made decisions, such as putting fewer voting machines in black neighborhoods than white ones, intended to help deliver his state to Bush.

Many experts dispute that Blackwell’s actions affected the outcome. But Ohio 2004 was an unhappy reminder of 2000, when Bush won the presidency only after the Supreme Court stopped a recount in Florida, where Bush’s brother was governor and the top election official, Republican Secretary of State Katherine Harris, was co-chairwoman of Bush’s campaign.

Another controversy this year could be more intense, Hasen said, due to the rise of social media like Facebook and Twitter, which he says make it easier for people to generate controversy and organize protests.

Picture credit: REUTERS/stringer

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Well Florida at it again. They are purging off Democrats and independents. I know that for the fact, as I just got my new voters card back today. I was purged and the only way I found out is I lost my homestead exemption and that was via a post card. In Florida is you are not registered to vote you don’t get the homestead. I had to spend 7 hours to get back my rights to vote as an independent. would have only taken 3 hours if i had marked GOP, and that was out of the staff’s mouth.

Posted by Susanbsbi | Report as abusive

The computers will be rigged in 6 Republican states to give Romney the lead. He’ll win by 1 million votes. There will be no contesting the election, despite the fact that a hundred thousand Democratic voters will be excluded from voting–the polls will close without them in Repbulican held states. The Supreme Courts has ruled that this is OK.

Posted by DrBilly | Report as abusive