Tales from the Trail

Washington Extra – Under fire

benHe is not quite the loneliest man in the world, but Fed chairman Ben Bernanke must be feeling in need of a friend these days. First those nasty Tea party types stormed the capital with their distinctively un-Fed-friendly views. Dismiss them as extremists if you will, but they seemed to have been joined by an array of world leaders in their criticism of quantitative easing, the Fed’s purchases of U.S. government debt in an attempt to stimulate the economy.

The rest of the world fears the Fed’s action amount to a backhand form of competitive currency devaluation. Many Republicans fear the Fed is enabling profligate U.S. budgetary policy. Even Fed governors and regional presidents are uneasy. Governor Kevin Warsh warned on Monday the Fed was not “a repair shop for broken fiscal or regulatory policies” and that the Fed could lose its “hard-earned credibility – and monetary policy can lose its hard-earned sway – if its policies overpromise or underdeliver.” Dallas Fed Reserve Bank President Richard Fisher then chimed in, calling quantitative easing “a bridge loan to fiscal sanity.”

In the end, the effects of the Fed’s latest move on economic growth may not be that dramatic. Its effect on the Fed’s long-term credibility, though, are less clear, and perhaps more worrying.

Finally today, hats off to the New York Times’ Norimitsu Onishi, whose research into Obama’s childhood in Indonesia threw up some unexpected gems. The future president, a chubby kid known as Barry, was apparently also referred to a “the boy who runs like a duck.” His nanny, an openly gay man, had an affair with the local butcher before running off to join a group of transvestites known as the Fantastic Dolls. But however unconventional his upbringing, even then Obama seemingly had leadership qualities.

Once, Onishi reports, Obama asked a group of boys whether they wanted to grow up to be president, a soldier or a businessman. A president would own nothing while a soldier would possess weapons and a businessman would have money, the young Obama explained.

Washington Extra – Nobel committee polishes Diamond’s credentials

After irking the Chinese with the award of the Nobel peace prize last week, the Nobel committee set a few feathers flying in Washington today by awarding the economics prize to Peter Diamond, an MIT professor who has also been nominated by President Barack Obama for a spot on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.pdiamond

Diamond’s nomination to the Fed job has been held up by Senate Republicans who have questioned his qualifications. At the time Richard Shelby, the most senior Republican on the Senate Banking Committee said the current uncertain environment would not benefit from board members deciding monetary policy “who are learning on the job” and told Reuters Diamond was a “behavioral man” who had no background in monetary policy and the economy.

It is a probably little conspiratorial to suggest the Nobel committee was deliberately tweaking Republican noses by recognizing Diamond along with two other leading economists for their work in helping to explain unemployment and jobs markets. Nevertheless, critics are bound to seize on this, along with Obama’s peace prize last year and Paul Krugman’s economics prize in 2008, to draw their own conclusions.