Tax Break

Essential reading: Tax fairness or tax competiveness?, Shockingly low taxes, and more

April 10, 2012

Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne said he's shocked how little tax some wealthy citizens pay

Welcome to the top tax and accounting headlines from Reuters and other sources.

* How to really simplify the tax code. Bruce Bartlett – The New York Times. Politicians hide behind grandiose plans for wiping the tax slate clean because they know that support for every specific tax expenditure is very high. In practice, saying that one would eliminate all tax expenditures is meaningless, nothing more than a gesture that avoids confrontation with the constituencies supporting tax expenditures. Perhaps the worst offender, in this regard, is Paul D. Ryan. Ryan steadfastly refuses to name a single loophole that he would eliminate. Link

* White House highlights tax fairness ahead of Obama speech. Alister Bull – Reuters. Taxes for America’s highest earners have fallen sharply since 1995, according to a White House report on Tuesday, released ahead of a speech by President Barack Obama on fairness in the tax code that is a key part of his campaign for reelection. The White House estimated the 400 highest income households in the country, who all earned over $110 million, paid an average of 18.1 percent of their income in federal taxes in 2007, well down for 29.9 percent those households paid in 1995.Obama travels to Florida later on Tuesday where he will urge support for the Buffett Rule. Link 

* Osborne ‘shocked’ by rich tax dodgers. Hannah Kuchler – The Financial Times. George Osborne, the British chancellor, has said he was “shocked” to discover that some of the richest people in Britain have used avoidance schemes to pay “virtually no” income tax. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) found that some of the highest earners paid an income tax rate of only 10 percent by using legal loopholes. The report found that Britain’s top 20 biggest tax avoiders had used three main loopholes to legally reduce their bills by a total of 145 million pounds ($229.96 million) in one year. The loopholes included offsetting the cost of business mortgages or borrowing on buy-to-let properties, receiving tax relief on donations to charity and writing off business losses in one of their companies against their income tax bill. Link

* The IRS lost my tax return. Maryam Ansari – via Reuters. The IRS can lose your tax return. That’s what the First Circuit Court of Appeals essentially said in a recent case. If you’re running a small business, you might want to take heed. It’s important to keep track of all your tax documents, in case the IRS or the U.S. Postal Service loses your return. The court was very clear in saying that if the medical center could prove that the claim was put in the mail, then they would give them some leniency. But they couldn’t prove it. They had no receipts from the post office, no recollection of putting the documents in the mail and no certified receipt or registered receipt. Link 

* Tax policy is about competition, not fairness. Amity Shlaes – The Wall Street Journal opinion. Walter Heller’s successful plan to combat the recession of the early 1960s was the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts, which pushed the unemployment rate below 5 percent and the growth rate above 5 percent from 2 percent. Crucially, the administration’s marketing pitch didn’t talk about “fairness” but about competition. Heller and Kennedy recognized that taxation (not only growth) is all about competition. Cities compete with cities, counties with counties, states with states, and nations with nations. Link

* Obama’s revenue soup. The Wall Street Journal editorial. The data clearly show that the overall economy is the single biggest factor in capital-gains realizations and revenue. But the data also show that time and again revenue has multiplied despite a lower rate, and arguably because of it. A higher capital-gains tax also makes equity ownership less valuable (because of the lower after-tax returns), so there is less appreciation in stock values when the tax rate is higher. Congress shouldn’t be fooled by government forecasters who predict a revenue boom from a higher capital-gains rate. Link

($1 = 0.6305 British pounds)

One comment so far | RSS Comments RSS

The IRS lost my tax return two years in a row. Both times they sent me a letter saying they hadn’t received it. The first time I filed electronically and received electronic confirmation from the IRS that they had received it, but when I attempted to efile the following year (2011 for 2010) they said they didn’t have my past year’s tax information on file and couldn’t accept my electronic return through the mail, so I mailed it, and they lost it again. I’m going to try certified mail this year, but I’ve heard of people who tried that additional safety net and the IRS still lost their return.

Posted by EEF | Report as abusive

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see