Welcome to the top tax and accounting headlines from Reuters and other sources.
* President’s populist pitch divides suburban voters. Colleen McCain Nelson – The Wall Street Journal. Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are battling over suburban, upper middle-class voters, a constituency important to both men. The president drew strong support from suburban voters four years ago. The question in the 2012 contest is whether these voters agree with Obama’s more populist economic message —or whether the tax-the-rich rhetoric is pushing them away. The president last week renewed his effort to extend Bush-era tax cuts for families with an adjusted gross income of less than $250,000 and raise marginal tax rates for wealthier Americans. Link
* Senator Murray says Democrats will let tax cuts expire. Jonathan Weisman – The New York Times. Senator Patty Murray of Washington, a member of the Democratic leadership, said on Monday that her party is prepared to allow all of the Bush-era tax cuts to expire and for automatic spending cuts to kick in unless Republicans give up their opposition to tax increases on the wealthy. Murray’s tough line, in a speech at the Brookings Institution, signaled a stiffening of Democratic resolve a week after President Obama reiterated his demand for a one-year extension in the Bush-era tax cuts only for people earning less than $250,000. Link
* Romney rejects calls on tax returns. Patrick O’Connor and Daniel Lippman – The Wall Street Journal.
* Poll finds Americans favor ending tax cuts for wealthy by 2-1 Jonathan Salant – Bloomberg news. Americans in a national poll say by a 2-1 margin that ending the Bush-era tax cuts on annual earnings of $250,000 or more would help the economy, a position President Obama has stressed in his campaign for another term. The survey by the Pew Research Center released yesterday shows that 44 percent said the higher taxes would be beneficial, while 22 percent said such a move would harm it and 24 percent said there would be no effect. Link
* Tax-exempt group’s election activity highlights limits of campaign finance rules. Jonathan Weisman – The New York Times. To Democrats and some campaign finance watchdogs eager to force more transparency in spending by independent groups, Hope, Growth and Opportunity stands out as the kind of “pop-up” organization that operates in virtual secrecy, with legal impunity. Such groups as Hope, Growth and Opportunity can serve as a conduit for large donors focused on races beneath the radar. The group raised $4.8 million, $4 million from one contributor. Link



















