Tax Break

Essential reading: Proposals to tax trades spark financial firm lobbying, and more

March 25, 2013

Welcome to the top tax and accounting headlines from Reuters and other sources.

* Trading clamps spur lobby effort. Jenny Strasburg and Scott Patterson – The Wall Street Journal. High-speed trading firms and exchanges are being forced into the lobbying game by taxes on trades in Europe, proposals for similar levies in the U.S. and beefed-up regulatory scrutiny. Link    

* U.S. seeks answers in Liechtenstein on tax cheats. Dylan Griffiths – Bloomberg. The U.S. has asked Liechtenstein to hand over data on foundations that may have been used to hide untaxed American money from the Internal Revenue Service, a step that may threaten Swiss banks. Link

* Email tax may slice spam and scams out of inboxes. George Skelton – The Los Angeles Times. An email tax — as part of a broader Internet tax — could raise money to help keep the Postal Service afloat, California Gordon Wozniak said of his proposal. Link    

* Hollande tries 66 percent. The Wall Street Journal editorial. Rest In Peace: The 75 percent top-marginal income tax, which French President Francois Hollande had been promising for millionaires since his campaign last year, is dead. Next up is a supposedly non-confiscatory 66 percent top rate. Link    

* Real tax reform would force both sides to do some heavy lifting. Robert Ehrlich – The Baltimore Sun opinion. The federal tax code is the primary tool used by Congress and the Executive Branch to direct public policy. Link    

* Is the estate tax doomed? Kenneth Scheve and David Stasavage – The New York Times opinion. For much of history, it was easier for a government to record the value of an estate than to track income on an annual basis. The lesson is clear: estate taxation first arose because it was easy, not because of concerns about inequality. Link    

* Our carbon, our climate, our cash. Nancy Folbre – The New York Times opinion. A tax on carbon consumption could help solve the global warming problem, bringing the prices of carbon-intensive goods and services into closer alignment with their true costs and discouraging us all from buying more of them. Link

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see