Disasters, emergency aid and the “third gender” in Nepal

May 1, 2013

When cyclones, tsunamis, earthquakes and other disasters strike, women and children, the elderly and disabled are usually reported to be those most affected and most vulnerable.

The particular problems that one group of individuals face at such times seem to be greatly under-reported.

Did you know, for example, that gay men in Haiti were denied food aid after the 2010 earthquake because ration schemes were aimed at women, and no women were registered in their households? Or that transgender people in Pakistan were denied entry to IDP camps after the floods because their ID papers did not match their appearance?

The discrimination doesn’t end there.

Researchers say there’s evidence that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people are often given lower priority than others during rescue efforts. Their families are excluded from distributions of food and other basic supplies. They face difficulties visiting injured partners and claiming the bodies of loved ones.

A recent paper by the Humanitarian Practice Network suggests these problems are often overlooked by development staff and emergency relief workers because they “cause unease” and there are few guidelines on how to deal with the issue.

For the response to improve, what’s required is a joint effort by the local authorities and aid groups to recognise LGBTI people and meet their needs along with those of others.

Disaster-prone Nepal – which benefits from a vibrant LGBTI rights movement – provides a compelling example of what legal recognition can do for LGBTI people in emergencies, according to a report in the latest issue of Forced Migration Review (FMR).

Home to Mount Everest and the birthplace of the Buddha, Nepal emerged from a decade of conflict in 2006, after which it began to acknowledge the rights of minority communities.

One such community are the metis – males who identify themselves as female. Metis have been characterised as gay men or transgender women, and have in the past suffered widespread violence at the hands of the state.

In 2008, many metis were displaced by flooding in Nepal’s Sunsari and Saptari districts. According to FMR’s report “Gender identity and disaster response in Nepal”, some spoke of discrimination in the relief process – being given only part of the food aid they were entitled to – while others who were relocated far from their homes said they were frightened of the reaction of their new neighbours.

For the full blog, click here

Photo caption: People salvage their belongings in a improvised boat from flood waters in east Nepal August 24, 2008. REUTERS/Nepal Army 11 Brigade/Handout 

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Why should a focus be put on so-called LGBTIXYZ individuals, when a simple focus on human rights should do? The last thing we need is to continue over-complicating matters by continuing the discrimination, in my opinion. I find far too many well-meaning and open-minded people falling into this provincialist mindset where everything must be divided and sub-divided to protect every little group. It seems to me that one person = one set of rights is the fastest route to a just world

Posted by Benny27 | Report as abusive