The Observatory

Titanic proportions

By Curtis Brainard
April 17, 2012

 

Copies of original newspapers describing the sinking of the Titanic rest in an exhibit at the South Street Seaport Museum commemorating the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic in New York

 

You can’t sink a good story.

The past few months have produced countless articles, columns, photo galleries, videos, and sundry media clips about the 100th anniversary of the RMS Titanic striking an iceberg and foundering in the frigid North Atlantic in the early hours of April 15, 1912.

The Washington Post‚Äôs Joel Achenbach¬†reported that the president of the Titanic Historical Society found himself ‚Äúbesieged with interview requests‚ÄĚ as he tried to survive the centennial. Wrote Achenbach:

This has become a media event as huge and flamboyant as the great ship that lies in ragged ruin at the bottom of the Atlantic.

The Titanic has never been bigger. The story has defied the rules of history, brightening rather than fading with time.

Reminding readers of historian Steven Biel‚Äôs¬†quote‚ÄĒ‚Äúthe three most written-about subjects of all time are Jesus, the Civil War, and the Titanic‚ÄĚ‚ÄĒDaniel Mendelsohn¬†proffered an explanation in¬†The New Yorker:

The inexhaustible interest suggests that the Titanic’s story taps a vein much deeper than the morbid fascination that has attached to other disasters. The explosion of the Hindenberg, for instance, and even the torpedoing, just three years after the Titanic sank, of the Lusitania, another great liner whose passenger list boasted the rich and the famous, were calamities that shocked the world but have failed to generate an obsessive preoccupation… unlike other disasters, the Titanic seems to be about something. But what?

Front-and-center in the anniversary coverage was, as Mendelsohn described it, the ‚Äúparable about the scope, and limits, of technology.‚Ä̬†Scientific American produced a terrific¬†special report, ‚ÄúThe Titanic: 100 Years Later,‚ÄĚ which focused on that angle with headlines such as, ‚ÄúCould the Titanic Disaster Happen Again?‚ÄĚ ‚ÄúThe Science behind the Iceberg that sank the Titanic,‚ÄĚ ‚ÄúIs It Possible to Build an ‚ÄėUnsinkable‚Äô Ship?‚ÄĚ and ‚ÄúTitanic: Resonance and Reality.‚ÄĚ Interesting pieces from¬†Discovery News and the¬†Pittsburgh Post-Gazette revisited questions about why so many perished despite the fact that the ship had the most advanced wireless radio system of its day. (At¬†The Atlantic, Megan Garber (formerly of CJR fame)¬†posted a short transcript of transmissions to and from the Titanic following its collision with the iceberg.)

The New York Times‚Äôs weekly Science Times section explored alternatives to the technological-hubris narrative. In a¬†fascinating article, William Broad outlined two new theories‚ÄĒabout king tides and atmospheric mirages‚ÄĒwhich ‚Äúargue that rare states of nature played major roles in the catastrophe.‚ÄĚ In a similar vein, posts at the¬†National Geographic News and the¬†Los Angeles Times‚Äôs¬†environment blog quoted Frank Lowenstein, head of climate-adaptation strategy for the Nature Conservancy discussing the possibility that, in a warming world, a ship travelling on the same route as the Titanic might encounter more icebergs today.

The bigger, or at least more widely covered, scientific controversy to emerge from the anniversary coverage surrounded a federal official’s assertion that there may be human remains at the 2.5-mile-deep site of the shipwreck. His claim is based on a 2004 photograph of the debris field released for the first time this week, which shows coat and boots embedded in the mud in the arrangement of someone wearing them.

‚ÄúThese are not shoes that fell out neatly from somebody‚Äôs bag right next to each other,‚ÄĚ James Delgado, the director of maritime heritage at the National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration,¬†told The Associated Press in a phone interview.

The New York Times quoted a variety of experts, including filmmaker James Cameron, who‚Äôs visited the wreck 33 times, disputing the claim, however. Its¬†article also offered a detailed description of the conditions‚ÄĒparticularly the amount of oxygen dissolved in the surrounding water‚ÄĒthat govern decomposition of organic materials in the deep sea.

Referring to the wreck site as ‚Äúhallowed ground,‚ÄĚ Sen. John Kerry introduced the R.M.S. Titanic Maritime Memorial Preservation Act last week, drawing fairly wide¬†coverage. The bill would strengthen legislation passed in 1986 and seeks to penalize disruptive exploration and illegal salvaging. Because the Titanic‚Äôs remains lie in international waters, however, many see new UNESCO cultural heritage protections, which are also getting some¬†media attention, as a better safeguard.

Those protections don’t prohibit all exploration and salvage, however. Over the years, thousands of artifacts have been recovered and sold. There have been a variety of articles about the biggest-ever auction of Titanic artifacts, comprising 5,500 items, arranged by the New York-based Guernsey’s. A few outlets have photo galleries of the stunning collection, which includes a 17-ton section of the hull. A court order stipulated that the items must be sold as a single lot, not piece by piece, and that the buyer will have to maintain the pieces and make them available for public display and research.

Unsurprisingly, the¬†best gallery of new images of the Titanic came from¬†National Geographic, which produced an anniversary¬†package for its April issue. The magazine worked with William Lange, the head of the Advanced Imaging and Visualization Laboratory at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, to construct ‚Äúa meticulously stitched-together mosaic‚ÄĚ of images of the large wreck site. As the cover story, ‚ÄúUnseen Titanic,‚ÄĚ explained:

In recent years explorers like James Cameron and Paul-Henry Nargeolet have brought back increasingly vivid pictures of the wreck. Yet we’ve mainly glimpsed the site as though through a keyhole, our view limited by the dreck suspended in the water and the ambit of a submersible’s lights. Never have we been able to grasp the relationships between all the disparate pieces of wreckage. Never have we taken the full measure of what’s down there… until now.

There‚Äôs so much more, with outlets pursuing almost every angle imaginable to mark the centennial. A self-deprecating¬†blog entry at¬†The Washington Post about ‚Äúoversaturated media coverage‚ÄĚ linked to over a dozen reports from its own writers.¬†The New York Times has a¬†Topics page for the Titanic, which shows a similar breadth of coverage in recent weeks. The¬†BBC,¬†The Telegraph, and¬†The Daily Beast all created special reports on their websites.

There’s also plenty for those interested in paleo-journalism. From The Huffington Post and Patch to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and WNYC there were many retrospectives on how news of the disaster broke in April 1912, and Discovery News posted a nice slideshow of the photos that accompanied that coverage.

Between the anniversary collections and those original reports there has, of course, been a steady stream of year-to-year reportage as well. As the¬†Post‚Äôs Achenbach rightly¬†put it, ‚ÄúEven if Titanic wasn‚Äôt unsinkable, fascination with it seems to be.‚ÄĚ

Picture Credit: Copies of original newspapers describing the sinking of the Titanic rest in an exhibit at the South Street Seaport Museum commemorating the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic in New York April 11, 2012. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  • # Editors & Key Contributors