<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rough and tumble Republican debate: who won?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/</link>
	<description>Tracking the 2008 U.S. campaign</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CaptainAmerica1776</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/#comment-333255</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainAmerica1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/#comment-333255</guid>
		<description>Why is there no mention of Dr. Ron Paul at all?
According to CNN's website, he overwhelmingly won in their online CNN/youtube debate polls:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hQoTAxgqI&#38;feature=related
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/debates/scorecard/youtube.debate.112807/results.html

Who is Ron Paul?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is there no mention of Dr. Ron Paul at all?<br />
According to CNN&#8217;s website, he overwhelmingly won in their online CNN/youtube debate polls:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hQoTAxgqI&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hQoTAxg qI&amp;feature=related</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/debates/scorecard/youtube.debate.112807/results.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/debates &nbsp;/scorecard/youtube.debate.112807/result s.html</a></p>
<p>Who is Ron Paul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/#comment-333244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/#comment-333244</guid>
		<description>Mitt Romney shinned the brightest. Rudy attacked him and then got his mudd shoved back down his throat. I wonder if every time Rudy caught a cab in NY he checked the cab drivers green card? Romney is the only one who answered the bible question without pandering. If you are a Christian the answer is simple you either believe or you dont- simple! He is a true leader with a clear and feasable plan. He is more than words---he is action and unlike HUckabee, he proved it in MA&#62; Huckabee flat out lied on taxes and he has more ethical skeletons than Nixon. Romney won hands down. CNN wants Huck as the winner because CNN is a dem network... of course they want Huckabee or McCain they  would be the easiest for the clinton money and political machine to beat. The only candidate that can stand toe to toe with hill is Romney. HE does not have any dirt for clinton to throw and that scares the hell out of the dems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney shinned the brightest. Rudy attacked him and then got his mudd shoved back down his throat. I wonder if every time Rudy caught a cab in NY he checked the cab drivers green card? Romney is the only one who answered the bible question without pandering. If you are a Christian the answer is simple you either believe or you dont- simple! He is a true leader with a clear and feasable plan. He is more than words&#8212;he is action and unlike HUckabee, he proved it in MA&gt; Huckabee flat out lied on taxes and he has more ethical skeletons than Nixon. Romney won hands down. CNN wants Huck as the winner because CNN is a dem network&#8230; of course they want Huckabee or McCain they  would be the easiest for the clinton money and political machine to beat. The only candidate that can stand toe to toe with hill is Romney. HE does not have any dirt for clinton to throw and that scares the hell out of the dems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/#comment-333184</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/29/rough-and-tumble-republican-debate-who-won/#comment-333184</guid>
		<description>I believe Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani had the strongest showings at the recent Republican Presidential Debate on 11/28/07. Both of them had clearly defined stances on the issues and did not mince words in expressing their stances. Mr. Huckabee really impressed me with his quick witted humor and ability to voice his views in a clear concise manner. Mr. Giuliani impressed me with his recollection of numbers and statistics when discussing his record of success as mayor of NYC. I feel Mitt Romney and Tom Tancredo had the poorest showings. Mr Romney seemed to fumble for words on more than one occassion and seemed to want to attack the other candidates as oppossed to telling the audience what his position was on several issues. Mr Tancredo did not seem very presidential in his comments and demeanor. I think he probably alienated himself from many voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani had the strongest showings at the recent Republican Presidential Debate on 11/28/07. Both of them had clearly defined stances on the issues and did not mince words in expressing their stances. Mr. Huckabee really impressed me with his quick witted humor and ability to voice his views in a clear concise manner. Mr. Giuliani impressed me with his recollection of numbers and statistics when discussing his record of success as mayor of NYC. I feel Mitt Romney and Tom Tancredo had the poorest showings. Mr Romney seemed to fumble for words on more than one occassion and seemed to want to attack the other candidates as oppossed to telling the audience what his position was on several issues. Mr Tancredo did not seem very presidential in his comments and demeanor. I think he probably alienated himself from many voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
