Comments on: Hillary Clinton’s emotional moment takes reporters by surprise

By: Dr BLT

Dr BLT — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:02:45 +0000

As they say,

If at first you Don’t Succeed (Cry, Cry Again)
Dr BLT copyright 2008
http://www.drblt.net/music/CryAgainDemo2 .mp3

By: Zoe

Zoe — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:51:47 +0000

I can’t help but agree, you should check out a similar article on dailycents.com talking about Hillary’s moment, the direct link to the article is http://blogs.dailycents.com/?p=790#comme nt-9127

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:49:00 +0000

It is so obvious that someone in her pack told her she must show her emotional side and forced out some “cackle” I mean crackle in her voice. Very nice touch. I am sure Bill showed her how to do a little acting for the sheeple, I mean people. Whats next, biting her bottom lip? This whole pre-election showboating is already making me sick.

By: Frank

Frank — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:42:26 +0000

…hmm…Clinton wins New Hampshire…who gets the last laugh?

By: Frank

Frank — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:42:41 +0000

Every anti-Clinton comment on this page proves my point. Not one of you hold ANY other candidates (incumbants included) to the same standards. Is this woman bashing or what…c’mon guys, you can’t all be that small….

By: bemoan

bemoan — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:19:43 +0000

How can a person who cracks under the pressure holds a position like US president? Nothing against her. But apparently, her campaign seems to be on the wrong track. One time, in an interview she tried to justify some terrorist organizations. Now this. Does this show an irreversible trend in her campaign?

By: WVdoesn'tCOUNT

WVdoesn'tCOUNT — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:17:03 +0000

That was FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!
Yeah, we get it: you’re human.

The shame is, this is what folks have asked for–a fake candidate. She’s got so much going for her, but she has to resort to acting such as this. She could even have better policies/ideas (who knows? it’s all so complex that not even policy experts agree on any issue!) than Obama, but since Obama is much more authentic he’ll get more votes.

Heck of a way to pick a prez…

By: Frank

Frank — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:26:09 +0000

I really didn’t think it was true, but this country really has turned “anti-woman” slowly, but surely since the Regan era. The largest voting block in the U.S. is “white women”…and yet, bashing women is everyone’s favorite past time…what’s next, repeal of the 22nd amendment? Hillary is far more experienced and not a junior senator like Obama. He’ll get about as much “change” done as Al Sharpton has…get real. Besides, anyone endorsed by “Oprah” is definitely NOT getting my vote Mr. Infotainment!

By: Susan Connors

Susan Connors — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:42:20 +0000

It’s getting a bit too weird in here for me, so here is my last comment:

We won’t get the President we need because most American’s don’t have a clue about what is really going on in this country, much less in the world.

If you vote for Obama, great. He’s smart, but what you’re seeing now is not his real personality. He is not even tempered and gets angry when he doesn’t get his way.

If you vote for Hillary, you will get a passionate person who may or may not get the job done, but she won’t do much harm either.

If you vote for Edwards, you’ll get a President who talks the talk

But if you don’t vote for Obama just because you’re a bigot, you’re a jerk. If you don’t vote for Hillary just because you’re a sexist, you’re also a jerk. And if you don’t vote for Edwards just because he’s rich, you’re just jealous.

We get what we deserve which last time got us Bush. I hope we do better this time around.

By: Think Progress » Giuliani invokes 9/11 when asked about Hillary’s tears.

Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:32:07 +0000

[…] MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Rudy Giuliani discussed Hillary Clinton’s “emotional moment.” “This is not something I would judge anyone on,” Giuliani said. He then quickly […]