Reuters Blogs

Tales from the Trail

Tracking the 2008 U.S. campaign

February 28th, 2008

McCain is tongue-tied in Texas

Posted by: Andy Sullivan
Tags: Tales from the Trail: 2008

rtr1xpbn.jpgRICHARDSON, Texas - Republican candidate John McCain has had trouble winning over some of his party’s conservatives, who suspect that deep down he’s not one of them. On Thursday, McCain may have confirmed their suspicions with a slip of the tongue.

“I’m a proud conservative, liberal Republic…,” McCain said before catching himself.

“Conservative Republican,” he said deliberately, as the crowd at a brand-new Texas Instruments manufacturing plant laughed. “Hello, easy there. Let me say this: I am a proud conservative Republican, and both of my likely opponents today are liberal Democrats.”

The Arizona senator had another gaffe later on when he described how he will take on the eventual Democratic nominee.

“It’ll be dispirited,” he said. “It’ll be spirited. Because there are stark differences.”

Click here for more Reuters 2008 campaign coverage

Photo credit: REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi (McCain takes a question at Texas Instruments on Thursday)

53 comments so far

It’s time for our Ultra conservative brethren to clearly understand that they are not and never have been the only elephant under the REPUBLICAN tent. If they can’t get on-board the Straight Talk Express at the convention, then perhaps it is time they find another tent.

As patriots of American Democracy first and foremost; We Republicans must never shy away from internal debate, critical perspectives and plurality of opinion. However we must also balance the books of this forum against the test of our American Democracy to define both our direction and chart our course of action in unity. We must be steadfast and weary of the intentions and ultimate purpose of any group that places its claims, its agenda or itself above that of our democratic majority system. This is what Ronald Regan meant by “Thou shall not speak ill of another Republican”. So Mr. McCain, you should be prepared to hold the exit door open for Rush and the rest if they can’t or simply won’t abide by these bedrock fundamentals of our Democracy and our party.

- Posted by Michael

Not everyone who generally votes Republican will be motivated to support McCain, as was the case with both Bushes, and Reagan, and every election. If candidates like McCain draw less support than usual from Republicans at election time, the party will learn to avoid “moderate” “mavericks” who are willing to run as vice-presidents on a Democratic tickets (i.e. Kerry/McCain 2004).

- Posted by George

Wow. I can’t wait for Obama v McCain. It should be a bigger blowout than Clinton v. Dole. You know it, I know it, and the American people know it.
peace

- Posted by william

I’m an independent. Michael’s words make the first sense I’ve heard coming from a Republican. YOU ARE RIGHT, Mike. What you said applies to ALL parties and to independents like me. We are all in this highly political society together. We have to live with one another, or kill somebody. There are TOO MANY voices on the fringe inciting “my way or the highway” thinking. There is no highway. I choose life, and have for 77 years.

- Posted by "JR"

Hear! Hear!

Time to clean out the big tent of these rabble rousers.

McCain speaks to the core, and he’s the next best thing to a re-animated Ronald Reagan.

- Posted by bill

McCain is a LIBERAL…what’s his stance on major issues?

- Posted by Bill

Michael,
I hear ya! All those right-wing nut jobs on the radio and tv have become much too powerful for their own good. They live in complete isolation from the issues facing the everyday Republicans (i.e. paying the mortgage, paying for heat, securing and working a job, etc.).

Larry

- Posted by Larry

We should be careful about voting for or against someone strictly because of party affiliation. What matters in the end is the policy and plans of the individual elected to office. I would rather vote for a winner and lose, than vote for a loser and win.

- Posted by Jeffrey

These slips of the tongue are more indicative of campaigning-fatigue. McCain isn’t a young man and these past 6+ months have taken a toll on him. Cut the old man a break!

- Posted by Wayne

Michael,

Speak English. What you mean is, “we should all vote Republican, right or wrong.” Which is a bit robotish, but pretty clearly your entire point.

Personally, I don’t care for democrats either (one party is filled with self righteous crooks, the other party is too) but I do enjoy Barack Obama’s, uhm, versatility. He doesn’t seem to be speaking to one crowd (white rich men who enjoy blowing up brown people, white women over eighty who like that you have a vagina). I dunno who will win in 08, but if I were a betting man, I’d say loyalty is overrated and what we need is more free thinkers.

Wait, was that your point?

- Posted by Robert

McCain has already lost the election. If you can’t convince your friends that you’re the right man for the job, what hope do you have with all the others?

- Posted by Scott

You say this as you speak ill of conservatives. Perhaps you don’t realize it, but a Republican tent without conservatives won’t win any elections either. While we find another tent, you probably want to find a new message as well. The Republican party will not survive without conservatives. If it does, it won’t be in power for awhile. And who will you blame for the problems when conservatives are gone?

- Posted by X

The Christian conservatives have hijacked the Republican party. They live by imposing their values on the rest of the country. It’s time the Republicans started over and built their coalition on pragmatism and steadfastness.

- Posted by ash

“find another tent.”

Indeed. The Republican Party was born of the break-up of the Whig Party over the slavery issue, and the modern day Republican Party can suffer the same fate. The warfare/welfare policy of empire so popular with McCain, Giuliani, and Romney is not sustainable.

- Posted by logicprobe

Conservatives will eventually rise again. This is just a cycle. It’s happened in other countries - just look a France. The trouble is, a Democrat is going to win this time - adopt socialized health care - and we will never get rid of it. It will bankrupt us.

- Posted by Jeff

McCain “100 years in Iraq”, “…there will be other wars” is a disaster for the Republican Party. I’m one of those limited government conservatives that have stuck with this party through thick and thin.

No more! Party has trumped principles and I see no turning back. The GOP is dead to me.

- Posted by McWarmonger

The modern republican party has nothing to do with being conservative. Anyone claiming this is a hypocrite.

- Posted by Michael B.

So,what is wrong with “ultra conservatism”? What you moderates call ultra was acceptable mainstream Republicansim just 20 years ago. And, when we look at where our country has gone in the past 20 years, maybe it is time we Republicans begin thinking once again in terms of conservatism.

Quite frankly, I would encourage the moderates and liberals to go over to the Democratic party and support Obama/Clinton. You moderates apparently like the idea of a Socialistic State with a huge centralized federal government. You think that “health care for all” is a good idea, but, it is the door opener to Socialized medicine in the United States. You moderates probably support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq and other parts of the middle-east and to expose Israel to attack from the Hamas and Hezbollah and the total chaos that would ensue if we were to cut and run.

The moderates (centrists), are the ones who are corrupting the established principles of our conservative values.

Granted, the President of the United States is the president of all the people, but, we, the electorate must stand on solid principle and adhere to the core beliefs of the Republican Party. Senator John McCain is a moderate to liberal candidate. When are we going to learn that a president who is moderate and reaches across the aisle to work with liberals, we, the conservatives lose every time. Liberals are like a cancer. They keep eating away at core conservative values and eventually conservatism in America succumbs to the Marxist ideology of the left and ultimately, all Americans will suffer the horrors of liberalism in America.

Governor Mike Huckabee is and has been the only true voice for conservatism in this primary campaign, but, as evidenced by the biased media, radio talking heads and the Club For growth incessant attacks on Mike Huckabee, we will end up succumbing to the liberal’s agenda. Thank you moderate Republicans for your unprincipled support of John McCain. We shall pay dearly in November.

- Posted by Larkin G. Mead

So Repubs are “patriots of American Democracy first and foremost”, eh? Well, you sure have had a lousy way of showing it the last 7+ years…

- Posted by ArchiesBoy

Admittedly, I’m not a Republican, but I do question whether Michaels has accurately captured the Republican “philosophy”. In my humble opinion, it works like this –

Republican/Conservatvies basically say “Trust me; I am the leader; I’ve thought about this, and I know more than you do; I will quickly make a decision, it may have flaws, but on balance you know I’m right, and by proceeding quickly and confidently, we will have a head start on the problem (or our enemies, if applicable).”

Democrat/Liberals basically say: “This is a big tent, and we want to make sure that everyone’s issues are considered. This may make our decision-making process slower than the Republicans, and it may make us sound less confident, but it also means that everyone’s views will be considered, and everyone will feel inoolved in the decision”

With that in mind, I think tht Michael is wrong — to have a larger Republican tent would be to turn them into Democrats — the idea of discussing the merits of various positions and reaching consensus just isn’t in the Republican playbook. If you have to think about the problem and reach a “considered” decision, then you are wasting valuable time, at least by Republican standards.

Of course, it hasn’t always been that way, but at least since the Republican “Contract with America” of the early 1990s, it seems that Republicans have established a set of principles that guide all decisions (and greatly slim-down the decision-making process), while Democrats still talk about(and sometime agonize over) how to do things.

I think that the problem that the right-most of conservatives have with McCain is that they recognize this “Cede all decision making to your standard bearer” concept, and, for the first time in at least 20 years, they aren’t sure that the decision maker is following the same set of principles as they are. They don’t want him to “invite them into the discussion before he makes his own decision”; that would be way to “Democrat”. They still value the “I know best, and I’ll be decisive” philosophy that we associate with Republicans, but they fear that McCain’s decisiveness will allow more immigrants, might raise taxes, etc., etc.

- Posted by Forrest

Republicans need to wake up to the fact that McCain is not a Republican, he is a RINO.
The only difference between him and the Democrats who he usually sides with, is War, War, and more War.
The most important issue is the Economy, and he is clueless.
I doubt he hs any chance of beating the Democrat in the General Election. The man is an Idiot, and they will chew him up in debate.
Sadly he has been pushed on us despite his record.

- Posted by Pete

“patriots of American Democracy”…
How about Patriots of the American Republic?

It’s sad when citizens don’t even know what form of government we are supposed to have. And then sanctimoniously pontificate upon their error.
I believe a LOL is in order

One may want to quote the framers of the constitution and founders of our REPUBLIC… they knew a little more about OUR form of Government than Reagan or the Ultra Liberal, “I proudly co-sponsor Constitution destroying bills with Ted (the drunken Murderer) Kennedy” John McShame!

bedrock fundamentals of our Democracy?
How about the bedrock fundamentals of Russia’s Democracy? Yeah… That fits better!

Rockwell

- Posted by George

Michael: Spoken like a true Democrat. Remember what Ronald Regan said when asked why he switched parties, “I didn’t leave the Democratic party, they left me”. John McCain could care less about the Republican party. In fact he has consistantly shown distain for it and it’s consertive base. I am not as you call it an Ultra Consertive. I think people should have to work for their money and get to keep most of it. I think that we should decide who comes to this country and if you break the rules, you should go to the back of the line and not the front. I believe that in several more years if things keep going the way they are, that there will be a vote on our national language but it won’t be English. If you want a vision into the future, take a look at France and the problems they are having because they didn’t control their borders and their creation of a welfare state. We really have no choices in this election.

- Posted by Eric

he’s a good man, and an independent THINK/er and if he wins he will sternly EDUCATE the Republican Party… and after so many years of the Party letting the likes of James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Limbaugh and Hannity and Bortz and Dr. Laura and Michael Medved do their framework thinking for them, it’s about time!
the Repulican Party will NEVER, EVER be the same outmoded jackboot-wearing machine it’s been under the thumbs of these armchair politicos.

- Posted by matt

“Michael” wrote:
“It’s time for our Ultra conservative brethren to clearly understand that they are not and never have been the only elephant under the REPUBLICAN tent. If they can’t get on-board the Straight Talk Express at the convention, then perhaps it is time they find another tent…”

My thoughts exactly Michael — very well said, and a very eloquent post throughout. Personally I am a registered republican, but for full disclosure I was a republican-leaning independent my entire life, and only registered republican in 2000 out of frustration, so I could vote for McCain in the NY primary. In my opinion, the two party system, particularly the primary process, is laughably inadequate as a representative democracy.

The following article, which I will quote from, provides a brilliant analysis of the true political positions of the majority of Americans: http://www.independentnation.org/moderat e_majority.htm

“Fifty percent of the electorate defines itself as moderate. 66 percent of American voters “favor solutions that come from the political center,” rather than the political right (13%) or left (8%)…”

“…the will of the majority of the American public is divided, and thus diluted, as more partisan voices devote themselves to the maintenance of their party’s apparatus. As a result, partisan political professionals have more than their share of influence over the selection of their party’s candidates and platform despite the fact that they are out of touch with mainstream American opinion…”

I think it’s high time the extreme wings of both parties are prevented from dominating the election process. I am thrilled that enough republicans have come to their senses and allowed McCain to get the Republican nomination. I believe he will win the general election with or without the extreme right wing, on the strength of his appeal to the sensible majority of Americans.

- Posted by Daniel

…and, I might add …. never before in our Great History of American Democracy has a political party turned, cannabalized and censored one of it’s own as they did 10 term Republican Congressman Ron Paul, our Greatest Statesmen since Thomas Jefferson, and then decide for all America the message we would hear and the messenger we would be allowed to vote for. This has been the most deliberate, orchestrated, and pre-ordained circus parade of all time & quite frankly, smells to high heaven. Hopefully, what remains of our “Party” will, once and forall, cave in on itself so that “We The People” can once again, come out of the ashes to re-claim what was once … the “Cream of the Crop”, the “Best of the Best”, the “Grand Old Party”. May the rest of you rest in peace!

- Posted by ricknhouston

The use of the term Ultra-conservative indicates a Left biased mindset. Just as the media characterizes Leftist-Socialists as Moderates and Conservatives as Ultra-conservative and Neo-Cons.

McCain is the pending nominee of the GOP. He is a true Conservative when it comes to Defense policy, and well versed in that area. However he has a very mixed record for economics and social issues. On illegal immigration he is totally out of sync with the Party’s and the Country’s rank and file.

Bottom line, he is all too often a RINO, but he’s still world’s better than Hillary or Barack. The party needs to get behind him to prevent a far Left take over that will leave this nation weaker than ever in recent history and extremely vulnerable economically, militarily and socially.

Obama has the #1 most liberal voting record in Congress — that should qualify him as a member of the extreme Left; by comparison McCain is a Moderate Conservative.

- Posted by Right is right

McCain is a war monger that supports liberal domestic policies. He is George Bush on steroids.

- Posted by truthseeker

I find it humorous when liberal Republicans (especially politicians) add the ‘conservative tag’ to themselves when they describe what party they belong to, as if it raises themselves to a higher rank within the party.

Then they go out and ‘out-liberal’ the liberal Democrats. This, I find sad.

And to think that there are different degrees of a conservative (He’s an ultra conservative. He’s a moderate conservative. He’s less conservative than the other guy.)

OK, so: ‘If you don’t agree on the legalization of abortion and you also don’t support the rule-of-law, then you are a brown belt conservative’. ‘If you don’t agree on the legalization of abortion and you believe in lower taxes and less government, then you are a black belt conservative’. NO, you are either conservative or you are NOT conservative. There are no levels or belts.

If a Republican enjoys adding the ‘conservative tag’ to their party identification, then they should also be ‘walking the walk’ at the same time.

Or, are we saying If you are a Republican - you are a conservative, and if you are a Democrat - you are a liberal? If so, I feel a draft Michael, so close your door, unless you are leaving.

- Posted by Lex

McCain is a Gun-Grabber

SPRINGFIELD, Va., Feb. 6 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The following is being issued by the Gun Owners of America:

“John McCain has actively worked against the Second Amendment and self-defense during his time in Congress. He also has been a spokesman for gun grabbers during state initiative campaigns,” said the three top officers of Gun Owners of America - Founder and Chairman Sen. H. L. Richardson (ret.), Vice-Chairman Tim Macy and Executive Director Larry Pratt.

“John McCain’s so-called ‘Straight Talk Express’ will derail if he attempts to con gun owners into thinking that he is really their man. If he had wanted the support of gun owners, and conservatives in general, McCain should have thought about that before chalking up his long string of unacceptable votes and initiatives.

“Gun Owners of America urge the conservatives gathering this week in Washington, D.C. for the CPAC 2008 to remember that John McCain is no conservative. He worked with Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) for amnesty for illegal aliens. He worked with Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) for protecting incumbents by gagging political speech. He voted against President Bush’s tax cuts, although now Senator ‘Straight Talk’ says that he is for making them permanent. He supported Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) when his presidential bid was beached by the Swift Boat Veterans. He even explored running with Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.

“He appeared in radio and TV ads in Colorado and Oregon on the behalf of an anti-gun group, in an attempt to cripple gun shows and register gun buyers.

“Conservatives should not support John McCain for president. It is for sure that gun owners will remember who has burned them and undermined the Second Amendment,” concluded the GOA officers.

Gun Owners of America

- Posted by JG

I agree with Wayne. McCain is showing his age. Getting tired. Can’t keep his rational mind in control. His feelings and unconscious beliefs come out.
Dave

- Posted by David Welsh

True conservatives vote with the Libertarian Party.

Why? Republicans have never been fiscally conservative — they only tout themselves to be so. Deficit spending, to me, is NOT a “Conservative Value”. Moreover, the Republican administrations that have continued to steer tax breaks to their rich friends (against free market principles) rather than giving fair tax breaks to ALL Americans — all while increasing federal bureaucracy, which makes future tax reductions impossible. This reckless fiscal policy runs directly opposite to true conservative principles.

Change is drastically needed, and since the Republicans are lacking a Theodore Roosevelt to cut through the mire of their own making, it is time to give 3rd party candidates serious consideration. Or, as some friends of mine have already admitted, support a Washington outsider like Obama or Nader who at least are minimally influenced by corrupt lobbyists. Send an honest man to the White House for once.

- Posted by Anthony

Well,
We know that that the Democrats are Gun-grabbers by nature, and now the so called Republican Conservitive???? Nominee is a Gun-Grabber..
None of these candidate’s oath to the Constitution means anything to them.
All are liberals, what ever they want to call themselves, NeoCon, Progressive..Same animal, just Wolves in Sheeps clothing undermining the American way of life.
I am going to go support the Ron Paul Revolutionaries..I want my country back.

- Posted by JG

Hay all you “Republicans” out there, I think it Was 1980 when Fascist started calling themselves Republicans and neo-con’s- try reading Lou Dobbs’s WAR ON THE MIDDLE CLASS, to see what a REAL Republican has to say, so stop calling yourselves one thing, when you, and your “values” are CLEARLY Showing something else, and that something else, is being a Fascist.

Other then that, the REAL reason you Fascist don’t like John Mcain , is bacause he’s not right wing enough, you people wont be happy till you get somebody like Mussolini in office, and the closest you ever got to that S.O.B, was with that other S.O.B Fascist, Reagan.

Before last week,I used to think that ALL Republicans (with the exception of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt) were evil, not so, bacause after reading the above mentioned book, after seeing what a good person he was, and having my faith in humanaty restored, (I diden’t even know that Mr. Dobbs was a Republican)I now see what a large part of the probelm is, many people (in the media and other wise) running around calling themselves Republicans and or conservatives when in fact, due to there so called “values” they are not. I now belive that Republicans of old- like Theodre Roosevelt- would have called people like Ronald Reagan, and anybody else with the same “values” what they really are, a Fascist.

And if we EVER get a Republican with “values” like Lou Dobbs, to run for office hell I might even vote for them.

And voting for a republican, was something I thought I’de never say.

- Posted by Steve

I’m not too surprised by these gaffes. McCain has done it before in debates earlier this year. Its nothing to worry about. He’s just showing his age.

- Posted by Bruce

McCain, the Straight Talk Turtle said we should be in Iraq for 100 years, long after his own great grandchildren would be dead.

And why? Because there is Al Queda in Iraq. And he would plan to go Al Queda them wherever they are.

Then why has he not mentioned Algeria, the birthplace of terrorism? They have Al Queda in the Maghreb in Algeria now in addition to the GIA and GSPC. Yes, the same Al Queda who bombed NYC and the Pentagon.

Is he confirming we are in Iraq, getting Americans killed and maimed just for oil? Seems to be the same reason we keep threatening Iran. Is his cowardly side showing in not mentioning the DPRK with its nukes and missiles?

- Posted by C. Josefovich

Actually, I think McCain got it right the first, on both counts.

- Posted by maryb

I am a tagless voter.

I will vote for Ron Paul as a Republican in my state’s primary. If Ron Paul secures the Republican nomination, I will vote for Ron Paul as a Republican president.

If McCain gets the Republican nomination, I will vote for Obama as a democrat, to keep McCain out of the Oval Office.

- Posted by dom youngross

McCain is another of those “say what they want to hear” fellows. Who can trust that?

I am ABSOLUTELY voting for Huckabee. If Huckabee runs as an independent, I am voting for him. If Huckabee is on any ticket, I am voting there.

- Posted by Robert Avila

I think the funny thing is that there are actually people who believe that Republicans and Democrats are polar opposites. Really people, are you naive enough to think there will be a significant difference depending on whether McCain or Obama is elected?

Welcome to the soup lines, my friends.

- Posted by Jerret

Poor McCain… he is tired and misspeaking and the press picks it up and the comediennes make fun of him. Obama keeps getting sharper and more eloquent and the national debate may be pathetic as he trumps the old man repeatedly. McCain supporters, get ready to wince for your man.

- Posted by cheryll

For a moderate to support Obama- about to become the most radical Democrat ever nominated for the presidency- wouldn’t make much sense.

Most of the American people are in the center. That’s one reason why McCain is going to win this November, the Obama-worshipping media to the contrary.

- Posted by Bob Waters

John McCain has allways had it in his power to path things up with conservatives, he simply refuses to do so. At any time, John McCain could have signed the “No Amnesty for Illegals” pledge that was circulated by the NumbersUSA organization. Other Canididates for office have done so. Pragmatically speaking, signing this pledge would have had no negative effect on the McCain campaign, and it would have gone a long way toward alaying the concerns and distrust that prevent conservatives and independents alike from supporting his candidacy. I agree, the Republican party can’t win anything if conservatives and independents stay home on election day. Perhaps its time that Republicans were left to wander in the desert for awhile. Its embarrassing when Republican pundits and advisers assert that “conservatives will come around in the general election”. Are they really suggesting that any responsible voter would cast a ballot for any candidate simply because they hate his opposition more? Has our electoral process actually come down to this? If John McCain truly wants to patch things up with conservatives, he needs to make an effort, sign the “No Amnesty for Illegals” pledge. Otherwise he’s delusional to believe that conservatives and independents have anything to gain or lose by staying home in November.

- Posted by Ed Weirdness

#7, HILARIOUS!!!

McWar will help you keep your job? Better hope you’re a weapons manufacturer or a food stamp administrator. Course you could always ‘join up’ and get shot at. Hundreds of thousands of valiant men and women are at ’stop loss’ now which makes them slaves. They can’t quit, even after their time in the service is up! That’s what you’ll be signing up for. Nah, seriously I wouldn’t worry because to support the army we’ll need with McWar we’ll have to reinstate the draft.

Godd thing we got rid of that dummy Ron Paul who’s WRITTEN 6 books on economics and has come in under budget EVERY YEAR he’s been in Congress. Wouldn’t want some jerk like that getting in and saving all our jobs, would we?

- Posted by Louis Nardozi

Ed Weirdness said:
“Are they really suggesting that any responsible voter would cast a ballot for any candidate simply because they hate his opposition more? Has our electoral process actually come down to this?”

Yes Ed, it has. If you would rather, as a matter of principle, not vote at all than vote for someone who disagrees with you on one issue (immigration)– then that is your right.

It will, however, make it that much more likely that the country will be run for the next 4-8 years by someone with whom you disagree on every single issue imaginable. Some people prefer to cut off their nose to spite their face, I guess.
“Extremists on the left tend to be just as critical of pragmatism as extremists on the right. Idealism without pragmatism is impotent.” -—Richard Nixon

- Posted by Daniel

McCain disgusts me, plain and simple. You can spout all the rhetoric you want, and label him liberal, a RINO, moderate…what I care about are the issues. This man’s only issue is war, and we’re supposed to believe he’s qualified to execute one because he participated in a very different war 40 years ago.
At the same time, the man who has the BEST plan to stop illegal immigration and rejuvenate the American economy has been dismissed because he used to be a preacher 20+ years ago. The Republican electorate deserves MUCH better than this manipulated, stage-managed primary. Huckabee gets my vote, write-in or not.

- Posted by DebInTX

Try and find the word democracy once in the US constitution. It is not there.

The US is NOT a democracy, was NOT a democracy, and will NEVER be a democracy. 300 million people and only two parties to represent all these diferentiated needs? Arguing Clinton or McCain is to argue heads or tails.

McCain is the vote for yesterday, Clinton is the vote for the status quo and Obama is the move towards socialism. Obama will be change, but it will not be what the US founding fathers had invisioned.

- Posted by Stan

DebinTX,
You say all you care about are the issues, but your comment that \”the man\’s only issue is war\”, shows your complete ignorance of McCain\’s career. If you were to attempt to identify a \”signature issue\” of his at all, it would probably be campaign finance reform.

Oh, but wait… I forgot — you\’re a conservative, so you\’re probably under the delusion that it is in your personal best interest to allow as much money (i.e. corruption)in politics as possible.

My bad…

Oh, and by the way — don\’t lie to yourself. What you are truly angry about, is that for once the primary was UNABLE to be manipulated and stage-managed. McCain was nominated by the majority of republicans, in their infinite common sense, despite, for once, the best efforts of the far right to dictate to the rest of us who they demand be coronated.

Thank God.

(FWIW, I like Huckabee alot. I\’d love to hang out with him, and maybe have dinner and jam a little. But some of his beliefs are a way too extreme for me(and clearly most other republicans also)to want him in charge.)

- Posted by Daniel

[…] Oy: Republican candidate John McCain has had trouble winning over some of his party’s conservatives, who suspect that deep down he’s not one of them. On Thursday, McCain may have confirmed their suspicions with a slip of the tongue. […]

- Posted by Michelle Malkin » John McCain’s botches of the week: “Liberal” and “dispirited”

#42….

most of the American people are “brainwashed” by the 24/7 bombardment the Zionist owned American media machine. Let there be NO MISTAKE!!! The war in the middle east IS, WITHOUT A DOUBT, about oil! What nobody is saying out of fear of being called “anti-semitic” is that the oil Americans are dying for is for ISRAEL!

- Posted by ricknhouston

@45

Daniel says:
February 29th, 2008 at 5:00 pm GMT
Ed Weirdness said:
“Are they really suggesting that any responsible voter would cast a ballot for any candidate simply because they hate his opposition more? Has our electoral process actually come down to this?”

Uhhhhhh! Yesss!

- Posted by ricknhouston

I’m a conservative republican. I’ve voted predominately Republican all of my life, and this is the first time I am disgusted with my party and their back room deals to cut Mike Huckabee out. I won’t be voting for John McCain because he does not mirror my convictions and in short…I just don’t trust him to do what is right. Regardless of how many endorsements he receives from the establishment politicians, our voices should still be heard, we should be the ones choosing our nominee. Our party is broken if all we can do is line up like robots and vote for McCain knowing his left-wing record. He will lose by a large margin to a either democrat. We need someone in our party to represent the people and be competition in Nov… Vote Huckabee!!!

- Posted by cons3rvative

New-Born Christians have been used by Republicans for voting purposes. The conservative elite do not care about them. See what happens with Huckabee! No one wants him there. He insists, but he will go nowhere. He won’t even be offered the Vice-presidency. Watch, listen, and learn…

- Posted by Alma

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word