Comments on: Chelsea Clinton dismisses “Monica” question

By: yeelee

yeelee — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:18:30 +0000

Now that Bill is seen as a liability, we’ve got to return to the ramifications of this question. Because I don’t think she should be given important status in Obama’s cabinet, especially as VP.

Think about it.

How will Hillary be respected during overseas negotiations if Bill is caught back home with his pants down again? If she can’t control her husband, how will she control ANY position that she’s representing?

By: Beth

Beth — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:52:17 +0000

If Chelsea doesn’t want to speak about her family’s private issues then we need to ask her a different question. Does Senator Clinton think it is okay that President Clinton lied to the country? We have the right to ask this question and it is certainly our business to know the answer.

Someone out there please ask her this question as it is unlikely she will campaign in this area again.

By: Nancy

Nancy — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:06:04 +0000

do not VOTE FOR HILLARY.

SHE IS A LIAR
SHE DID DO CRIMES
SHE SHOULD DO THE TIME IN JAIL
SHE SHOULD BE NOT ALLOWED TO BE RUNNING

HER SPOUSE
DID GET IMPEACHED AND DID LIE TO ALL OF US
WHY IN THE HECK IS ANYONE IN A RIGHT MIND WISHING TO VOTE FOR THAT SICK WOMEN AND SICKER SPOUSE AND A CHILD THAT ALSO TELLS US THAT WE ARE RUDE. HELL SHE IS MORE RUDE THAN ANY OF US. WE DO HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT THESE SICK PEOPLE ARE UP TO I MEAN HILLARY SICK O AND HER SPOUSE WHO IS SICKER THAN SICK.
THE MALE WOMENIZER. MAKE THE SOUNDS OF THE MOVIE JAWS ON THAT ONE. YOU KNOW THE TUNE.

WELL IF THIS SO CALLED WOMEN GETS INTO OFFICE BEAR IN MIND WE GET TO HAVE ANOTHER IMPEACHMENT I WISH WE HAD ONE FOR BUSH MORE THAN ONCE.

HECK PEOPLE WE DO NEED A CHANGE FROM
UNMORAL CLINTONS
FROM BUSH WHO BASHES OUR MONEY TO NOTHING
FROM THE UNTRUTHS OF 9 11. HATE TO SAY THIS ONE BUT WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO ON MANY FACTS OF 9 11 AND DON’T EXPECT TO GET THE TRUTH OUT OF THE CLINTONS ASKED TO TELL IT
BILL CALLED A PERSON IN THE CROWD RUDE AND ANSWERED WAY PRIOR TO 9 11. THE QUESTIONS WERE WE WANT THE TRUTH OUT ON 9 11. ON THAT HE CALLED THE PERSON RUDE. SO WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU OH DON’T FORGET BILL DID THE FINGER AGAIN HE POINTED AND SAID ANOTHER LIE TO THAT MAN TOO. YOU KNOW I NEVER WISH TO SEE BILLS FINGER POINTED AT US AGAIN. EVER
I DID NOT LIE HE SAID TO US WELL HATE TO SAY THIS BUT THE CLINTONS LIE EVEN IN THEIR DIRTY PANTS. TRY INSIDE AND OUT. WHO IN THE HELL WOULD WANT TO VOTE FOR THEM AGAIN.

IF YOU DO WANT TO VOTE FOR HILLARY,,,
GO SEEK A MENTAL HOSPITAL,
YOU NEED IT.

DON’T ERASE THIS MESSAGE HECK FLASH IT ALL OVER THE PLACE IT IS BETTER FLASHED THAN CLINTONS DAUGHTER SAYING WE ARE RUDE IF WE ASK FOR THE TRUTH AS WELL. HER ANSWERS ALSO MAKE ME SICK
IT JUST SHOWS YOU HOW MUCH SHE WAS ALSO BRAIN WASHED. I MEAN TOTALLY BRAIN WASHED I BET IN A FEW MORE YEARS SHE WILL BE IN THE NEED OF TREATMENTS AS WELL INTO A MENTAL HOSPITAL. SHE SHOWS SOME SIGNS OF THAT NOW.

SHE CAN’T EVEN SPEAK UP RIGHT FOR SOMETHING THAT NO ONE CAN. PLEASE GET THEM HORRIBLE CLINTONS OUT OF OUR FACE. NOW THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT BILL SAID TO ONE MAN GET OUT OF MY FACE HE SAID TO HIM. WELL PLEASE DO NOT I BEG YOU NOT TO VOTE FOR THIS SICKO FAMILY EVER AGAIN. THE GOOD NEWS IS IF THIS COLD WOMEN LOSES THIS ELECTION THEY SAID SHE CAN NOT RUN AGAIN. I SURE AS HELL HOPE NOT.

By: Reader

Reader — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:04:13 +0000

RE: Chelsea Clinton / Monica Lewinsky Question

My question is …

“Was Monica Lewinsky really hired as a paid prostitute?”

Monica was chosen-hired for her randy handiness and skills in giving BJ’s as well as her willingness to participate in unusual, vulgar and kinky sexual activities on the job - and to talk dirty to to her boss (President Clinton) in the Oval Office during office hours and after hours as well.

Usually when a woman does these type of sexual activities as her paying job, she is defined as a paid hooker. If Monica was paid for her 9-5 sexual services to Bill Clinton, they were both breaking the law, as well as degrading and cheapening the office of the president with their low brow sex - as well as detracting them both from working on issues important to the voters who were paying both their saleries. Usually if a company president (or boss) paid an employee for similar sexual services during office hours, they would both be fired if caught.

Another question, Who was the “pimp” that sent Monica to Bill in the first place? Did he/she provide intern-prostitutes for other politicians in a “Heidi-Feiss” operation?

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:50:13 +0000

Chelsea stated yesterday that “You are voting for my mother not my father” so should that not allow Obama to say “you are voting for me, not my pastor?”

End of subject.

By: Erin

Erin — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:21:51 +0000

I cannot believe anyone could be so rude or have such lack of repect for to ask that question to the daughter of the father that cheated on her mother. These people have no manners, now it’s fashionable because the press is endorsing it for a sound bite. RUDE!

By: Jackie

Jackie — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:43:23 +0000

Chelsea is absolutly right - it is no one’s business. I applaud her and think those that were ill-mannered enough to ask needed to be put in their place.

By: nicole

nicole — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:24:16 +0000

I understand that Hillary is campaigning and these questions will come up to Chelsea. I think Chelsea handled the question very well. What else is she supposed to say. Everyone should stop giving her such a hard time.

By: Dave Spangler

Dave Spangler — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:58:57 +0000

Anyway you cut it, Bill Clinton wagged his finger and lied to the American people. That is what took Richard Nixon down. Hillary had to know about the possibility of the accusations being true because there had been prior incidents of women accusing Bill of extracurricular activities.

By: Dorothy Democrat

Dorothy Democrat — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:30:21 +0000

Chelsea Clinton may not want to talk about Monica’s blue dress but we Americans shouldn’t let Bill Clinton’s daughter prevent us from having a conversation that is very important to the future of our country. If Senator Clinton becomes our next president, Bill Clinton will be back in the White House and, almost certainly, up to his old tricks. Despite running an excellent and tough campaign, Hillary Clinton has repeatedly demonstrated an inability to control her husband. And we should use this insight as an opportunity to assess the cost we paid as a country for that blue dress and the lies that Bill Clinton told about everything related to it.

Look, don’t get me wrong: I thought the attempt to impeach Clinton was an incredible miscarriage of justice. The only problem was he didn’t make it any easier with his repeated lies and misstatements, to say nothing of his incredibly inappropriate behavior. At least one member of Senator Clinton’s current campaign has suggested to me that Bill is still the same old skirt chaser he always was. If and when his wife becomes President, this will no longer be his private business anymore. And since there seems to be scant likelihood that Bill Clinton will change his ways, it is– with all respect to Chelsea’s sensitive feelings– a good idea that we have a national discussion now about whether we as a nation can afford another four years of Bill’s marauding sexual appetite given the ambitious (and admirable) agenda which his wife has determined to fulfill.

One committed supporter of Senator Clinton expressed her private wish to me that Hillary Clinton– humiliated and insulted so many times by a selfish and narcissistic husband– would leave Bill Clinton once and for all. It will probably never happen, but if it did, I’ll bet Senator Clinton’s popularity would surge in the polls. I can tell you one thing: she’d certainly get my currently undecided vote.