<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unhappy mediums: Should psychics face tougher controls?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/</link>
	<description>Insights from the UK and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Pragnell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-9180</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Pragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-9180</guid>
		<description>Having grown up in the world of spiritualism it was always the norm to myself.One of the first things that a SNU medium will say is i won&#039;t predict when working.9 times out of 10 that is the first thing they do.Contacting loved ones maybe, but to predict is opening doors of hope to vunerable and gullible people.Many use this information to forge on with their lives looking for the prediction to come to light.This destroys confidence and self esteem leading to depression,self harm and possible suicide.All mediums whatever they believe all give unproven predictions and have such power over the clients they read for.Regulation and or some type of accreditation must happen to safeguard the public.Not to mention the financial prosperity of the phonelines who use the entertaiment ploy to push more unproven readings.One particular company also runs a one to one sex chat line from the same building in London.Need i say more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having grown up in the world of spiritualism it was always the norm to myself.One of the first things that a SNU medium will say is i won&#8217;t predict when working.9 times out of 10 that is the first thing they do.Contacting loved ones maybe, but to predict is opening doors of hope to vunerable and gullible people.Many use this information to forge on with their lives looking for the prediction to come to light.This destroys confidence and self esteem leading to depression,self harm and possible suicide.All mediums whatever they believe all give unproven predictions and have such power over the clients they read for.Regulation and or some type of accreditation must happen to safeguard the public.Not to mention the financial prosperity of the phonelines who use the entertaiment ploy to push more unproven readings.One particular company also runs a one to one sex chat line from the same building in London.Need i say more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-7439</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-7439</guid>
		<description>It is with interest in uniformity and fairness that I ask the question:

&quot;If the new legislation is to keep people (in this insance psychics)honest, then when will this legislation be passed on to those people entrusted with more important things than the services that psychics offer?  It would be nice to know that forecasting and promise-making by financial advisors, investors, civil servants, doctors and politicians to name a few, would be enforceable by law if their &#039;predictions&#039; failed to meet up with reality!&quot;

Oh, now its a different story hey? Well, actually no, it&#039;s not.  

Everyone can have a &#039;bad hair day&#039;, psychics included, and NO! I am NOT a psychic.  I am just bemused at the rants and raves of controllers in positions of power who make and apply these laws and &#039;ethics&#039; that they mete out to others yet do not apply these same laws and ethics to themselves.

Let&#039;s get with the program, and change things by stopping hypocrisy and taking care of how we personally conduct ourselves.  Who knows, it might just spread!

Cheers, Diane H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is with interest in uniformity and fairness that I ask the question:</p>
<p>&#8220;If the new legislation is to keep people (in this insance psychics)honest, then when will this legislation be passed on to those people entrusted with more important things than the services that psychics offer?  It would be nice to know that forecasting and promise-making by financial advisors, investors, civil servants, doctors and politicians to name a few, would be enforceable by law if their &#8216;predictions&#8217; failed to meet up with reality!&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, now its a different story hey? Well, actually no, it&#8217;s not.  </p>
<p>Everyone can have a &#8216;bad hair day&#8217;, psychics included, and NO! I am NOT a psychic.  I am just bemused at the rants and raves of controllers in positions of power who make and apply these laws and &#8216;ethics&#8217; that they mete out to others yet do not apply these same laws and ethics to themselves.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get with the program, and change things by stopping hypocrisy and taking care of how we personally conduct ourselves.  Who knows, it might just spread!</p>
<p>Cheers, Diane H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -ES-</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-4660</link>
		<dc:creator>-ES-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-4660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m appauled by Jan&#039;s statement, please show some respect. why do skeptics always compare mediums and psychics to frikkin paedos? TWO VERY DIFFERENT things

Personally I have never charged nor will ever charge for my services, I believe anyone who wants these services and needs help should be able to get it for free, so this law will not affect me but this is very worrying for spiritualists, why should we have to say we don&#039;t beleive in what were doing, why should we have to be forced to say this, are christians forced to say &quot;god may not be real so please don&#039;t sue us if he&#039;s not?&quot; NO, spiritualism is a religion.

The govt really haven&#039;t thought things through, AS USUAL, this has left the industry wide open for skeptics to bring malicious cases forward. We get no protection from this other than if we prove ourselves, which may not be so easy for some &#039;genuine&#039; psychics.

Think about it this way, when you apply for a job or go for an audition, you get nervous as hell dont you? and nerves often get the better of people in these situations, it&#039;s exactly the same for psychics fear, worry and all of those things can have an affect on our abilities exactly the same way it would affect your voice if you were nervous at an audition. What would happen if a malicious case came up against a &#039;genuine&#039; psychic and they couldn&#039;t prove themselves because they were nervous, scared or worried, an innocent person could end up being prosecuted.

It&#039;s not fair, the law should protect BOTH clients and readers but from what I see this is very one-sided and a chance for skeptics to make a mockery of a thriving industry with many genuine psychics and mediums who do a lot of good for this world, yes there are lots of frauds and they should be prosecuted, there will be frauds in EVERY single industry there is, the psychic industry is VERY different and needs it&#039;s OWN set of laws, you just cant standardise something like this, you have to take the nature of the industry into consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m appauled by Jan&#8217;s statement, please show some respect. why do skeptics always compare mediums and psychics to frikkin paedos? TWO VERY DIFFERENT things</p>
<p>Personally I have never charged nor will ever charge for my services, I believe anyone who wants these services and needs help should be able to get it for free, so this law will not affect me but this is very worrying for spiritualists, why should we have to say we don&#8217;t beleive in what were doing, why should we have to be forced to say this, are christians forced to say &#8220;god may not be real so please don&#8217;t sue us if he&#8217;s not?&#8221; NO, spiritualism is a religion.</p>
<p>The govt really haven&#8217;t thought things through, AS USUAL, this has left the industry wide open for skeptics to bring malicious cases forward. We get no protection from this other than if we prove ourselves, which may not be so easy for some &#8216;genuine&#8217; psychics.</p>
<p>Think about it this way, when you apply for a job or go for an audition, you get nervous as hell dont you? and nerves often get the better of people in these situations, it&#8217;s exactly the same for psychics fear, worry and all of those things can have an affect on our abilities exactly the same way it would affect your voice if you were nervous at an audition. What would happen if a malicious case came up against a &#8216;genuine&#8217; psychic and they couldn&#8217;t prove themselves because they were nervous, scared or worried, an innocent person could end up being prosecuted.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not fair, the law should protect BOTH clients and readers but from what I see this is very one-sided and a chance for skeptics to make a mockery of a thriving industry with many genuine psychics and mediums who do a lot of good for this world, yes there are lots of frauds and they should be prosecuted, there will be frauds in EVERY single industry there is, the psychic industry is VERY different and needs it&#8217;s OWN set of laws, you just cant standardise something like this, you have to take the nature of the industry into consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-4148</guid>
		<description>The regulations simply revoke the previous controls. They do not specifically target mediums or pyschics nor exclude other religions.  Unfortunately they do not target fraudulent media which would be far more useful!

As to enforcement, this will mostly be by trading standards and with only one officer for every 2000 business premsies in the UK don&#039;t hold your breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The regulations simply revoke the previous controls. They do not specifically target mediums or pyschics nor exclude other religions.  Unfortunately they do not target fraudulent media which would be far more useful!</p>
<p>As to enforcement, this will mostly be by trading standards and with only one officer for every 2000 business premsies in the UK don&#8217;t hold your breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rao</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>tighter control or not.. i find this news very disturbing. what i fail to understand is why have religious leaders and preachers have been left out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tighter control or not.. i find this news very disturbing. what i fail to understand is why have religious leaders and preachers have been left out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-3472</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>I have read all of the comment so far and it appears that there are a lot of ignorant people out there.  When I say ignorant, I mean that they come from a place of &#039;not knowing&#039; and there are those who have closed minds.

Spiritualism was on the Earth many, many years before the recognised and &#039;organised&#039; religions.  Seers and prophets have also been on the Earth before today&#039;s religions; these were the mediums and psychics of their day. 

A true Spirit medium connects with Spirit to deliver truth and guidance that is timely and appropriate for the listener. The emphasis is always on &#039;guidance&#039;. All those who come for a reading from a true Spirit medium should always be advised that they have free will to either accept the guidance given, or not. If the words they hear fit in with a current situation in their lives and offers a helpful way forward, then they may choose to accept it. If the listener does not feel that they can &#039;work&#039; with this guidance,or that it does not fit in with their feelings about the situation, then they should ignore it. It does not mean that the information is incorrect, but that the listener has chosen at that time not to accept it. This is free will, which we all have.  

A psychic is one who predicts the future and some who practice psychic readings also receive their information from Spirit.

In both situations - guidance or a future prediction - it is for the listener to decide whether that which is being given is acceptable and resonates with what is happening in their lives at that particular time. If they feel it is not, then they are free to withhold payment. As with all purchases, the consumer is king! 

I accept that there are vulnerable people who are searching for answers and need protection those who will exploit them, but will this new piece of government interference really solve the problem. I think not.

Dorothy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read all of the comment so far and it appears that there are a lot of ignorant people out there.  When I say ignorant, I mean that they come from a place of &#8216;not knowing&#8217; and there are those who have closed minds.</p>
<p>Spiritualism was on the Earth many, many years before the recognised and &#8216;organised&#8217; religions.  Seers and prophets have also been on the Earth before today&#8217;s religions; these were the mediums and psychics of their day. </p>
<p>A true Spirit medium connects with Spirit to deliver truth and guidance that is timely and appropriate for the listener. The emphasis is always on &#8216;guidance&#8217;. All those who come for a reading from a true Spirit medium should always be advised that they have free will to either accept the guidance given, or not. If the words they hear fit in with a current situation in their lives and offers a helpful way forward, then they may choose to accept it. If the listener does not feel that they can &#8216;work&#8217; with this guidance,or that it does not fit in with their feelings about the situation, then they should ignore it. It does not mean that the information is incorrect, but that the listener has chosen at that time not to accept it. This is free will, which we all have.  </p>
<p>A psychic is one who predicts the future and some who practice psychic readings also receive their information from Spirit.</p>
<p>In both situations &#8211; guidance or a future prediction &#8211; it is for the listener to decide whether that which is being given is acceptable and resonates with what is happening in their lives at that particular time. If they feel it is not, then they are free to withhold payment. As with all purchases, the consumer is king! </p>
<p>I accept that there are vulnerable people who are searching for answers and need protection those who will exploit them, but will this new piece of government interference really solve the problem. I think not.</p>
<p>Dorothy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Walls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>The argument for tighter control is fair when you see all the US based &#039;internet psychics&#039; Who tell you you have a big window coming up that will mean vast sums of money will come your way, but to take advantage of this&#039;window&#039; you need a full reading which will cost $60.

Also there are the &quot;fortune Tellers&quot; who will tell your fortune, though some are psychically gifted and can sense things, often they are picking up from your aura what is on your mind and interpreting it, and sometimes just telling you what they think you want to hear. For £5 on a sea front, these are often taken by people with a pince of salt, though if someone walks away from a job or marriage &quot;because a psychic said to&quot; there must have been doubts already present.

Mediums and spiritualism is different, in that Mediums receive messages from those who have passed over to &#039;spirit&#039; and whilst there is no scientific proof of the existence of &#039;spirit&#039; then the same applies to &#039;God&#039; and all other Religions that pronounce upon &quot;a life after death&quot;

If Spiritual churches are now to declare that the demonstration of Mediumship is for entertainment only, then so should all churches where there is service that involves any mention of &#039;life here after&#039;  Or those that propound reincarnation, as no &#039;scientific proof&#039; exists of that though many examples of regressive hypnosis have been documented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument for tighter control is fair when you see all the US based &#8216;internet psychics&#8217; Who tell you you have a big window coming up that will mean vast sums of money will come your way, but to take advantage of this&#8217;window&#8217; you need a full reading which will cost $60.</p>
<p>Also there are the &#8220;fortune Tellers&#8221; who will tell your fortune, though some are psychically gifted and can sense things, often they are picking up from your aura what is on your mind and interpreting it, and sometimes just telling you what they think you want to hear. For £5 on a sea front, these are often taken by people with a pince of salt, though if someone walks away from a job or marriage &#8220;because a psychic said to&#8221; there must have been doubts already present.</p>
<p>Mediums and spiritualism is different, in that Mediums receive messages from those who have passed over to &#8216;spirit&#8217; and whilst there is no scientific proof of the existence of &#8216;spirit&#8217; then the same applies to &#8216;God&#8217; and all other Religions that pronounce upon &#8220;a life after death&#8221;</p>
<p>If Spiritual churches are now to declare that the demonstration of Mediumship is for entertainment only, then so should all churches where there is service that involves any mention of &#8216;life here after&#8217;  Or those that propound reincarnation, as no &#8216;scientific proof&#8217; exists of that though many examples of regressive hypnosis have been documented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>if you dont believe in mediumship then why comment on something you dont understand. spiritualism is a faith and religian and noone asks christians to prove their faith. nor do people think ministers comeing to offer you guidance from a church are fraudsters. if you feel drawn to visit a medium go to a spiritualist church not a private medium. spiritualist mediums go through years of training before they are allowed to stand up and give messages to the church. 
mediumship isnt about seeing into the future its about picking up things from a persons energy and passing information on from the spirit world. if you dont belive in it then dont go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you dont believe in mediumship then why comment on something you dont understand. spiritualism is a faith and religian and noone asks christians to prove their faith. nor do people think ministers comeing to offer you guidance from a church are fraudsters. if you feel drawn to visit a medium go to a spiritualist church not a private medium. spiritualist mediums go through years of training before they are allowed to stand up and give messages to the church.<br />
mediumship isnt about seeing into the future its about picking up things from a persons energy and passing information on from the spirit world. if you dont belive in it then dont go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conscientious Observer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Conscientious Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Yeh lets go after these fraudsters and charletons.  They&#039;re easy to get at.  Whether or not they actually help people is irrelevant...  We do have the choice of not using their services and perhaps they should be regulated.  But what about the other fraudsters and charletons currently in out political and judical systems?  We don&#039;t have the choice of not being affected by these fraudsters (politicians / lawyers / judges etc) unless we don&#039;t live in society or if we do, don&#039;t vote, don&#039;t be a victim or offender, buy property etc etc.  By the way I don&#039;t think these psychic fraudsters are in the same legue as pedophiles and should not be regarded  on the same level.  Pedophilia, if you actually think about it, is not a service that the children can choose to use, nor does pedophilia offer those vulnerable victims hope or put them at ease.  Most Psychics won&#039;t inflict and continually inflict their irrational perverseness on children. That is of course if they are a pedophile and the parents are stupid enough to continually take them to this person.  It&#039;s a pity such a morally, psychologically and physically devastating activity (pedophilia), can&#039;t be &#039;punishable by death&#039; or castration etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh lets go after these fraudsters and charletons.  They&#8217;re easy to get at.  Whether or not they actually help people is irrelevant&#8230;  We do have the choice of not using their services and perhaps they should be regulated.  But what about the other fraudsters and charletons currently in out political and judical systems?  We don&#8217;t have the choice of not being affected by these fraudsters (politicians / lawyers / judges etc) unless we don&#8217;t live in society or if we do, don&#8217;t vote, don&#8217;t be a victim or offender, buy property etc etc.  By the way I don&#8217;t think these psychic fraudsters are in the same legue as pedophiles and should not be regarded  on the same level.  Pedophilia, if you actually think about it, is not a service that the children can choose to use, nor does pedophilia offer those vulnerable victims hope or put them at ease.  Most Psychics won&#8217;t inflict and continually inflict their irrational perverseness on children. That is of course if they are a pedophile and the parents are stupid enough to continually take them to this person.  It&#8217;s a pity such a morally, psychologically and physically devastating activity (pedophilia), can&#8217;t be &#8216;punishable by death&#8217; or castration etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/comment-page-1/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2008/04/18/unhappy-mediums-should-psychics-face-tougher-controls/#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>Like everything else in the world there are good people and bad people.  Don&#039;t let the bad ruin it for the good!  All I have seen on the news lately is unfortunete children being abused in sacred places!  Is anyone asking them to prove their beliefs in a court of law??  Solution? Lets clamp down on the spiritualists!!!  Give your heads a shake!!!  I thought we lived in a logical society.  

&quot;The truth is right under your nose, you just have to look.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like everything else in the world there are good people and bad people.  Don&#8217;t let the bad ruin it for the good!  All I have seen on the news lately is unfortunete children being abused in sacred places!  Is anyone asking them to prove their beliefs in a court of law??  Solution? Lets clamp down on the spiritualists!!!  Give your heads a shake!!!  I thought we lived in a logical society.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The truth is right under your nose, you just have to look.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

