UK News

Insights from the UK and beyond

Pensioners ripped off by “antithesis of plain English”

May 9, 2008

pensioners1.jpgThe “open market option”: it sounds like complex financial jargon. But  it’s certainly worth knowing about. For, when it comes to retirement, it could boost your income by almost 25,000 pounds.

A 65-year-old woman with 100,000 pounds-worth of pension savings could be missing out on a staggering 24,162 pounds by failing to exercise this right; a man by 23,025 pounds, according to numbers crunched by independent financial service provider Hargreaves Lansdown. That is around the same as average annual earnings in the UK last year — 23,764 pounds, according to the Office for National Statistics.

More than 85 percent of savers buy an annuity contract when they retire. This guarantees an income for life in exchange for savings built up in a pension fund. “That’s always been the case and is likely to remain the case, as for most people it really is the right thing to do: they need the certainty of income and haven’t got many other assets,” Nigel Callaghan, a pensions analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, the largest annuity broker in the UK, tells Reuters.

Some 200-plus companies offer pensions. Yet only a small proportion — a dozen or so — “play” the annuity market. The average difference between the best and worst annuity rates published by the Financial Services Authority is more than 15 percent. Legal & General, Prudential, Axa, Friends Provident and Norwich Union are among those that vie to be competitive.

But did you know that savers need not buy their annuity from the company with which they’ve stashed their retirement savings? This — the “open market option” — became a contractual right in 2002, forcing insurers to send “wake up letters” to those approaching retirement to tell them of their ability to scour the market for the best deal. Despite that, the number of people exercising this right has remained largely static at around a third.

“Consumers are being ripped off right, left and centre when it comes to retirement,” says Callaghan. “Many, if not most, of these letters are the complete antithesis of plain English. Some are six-plus pages and you’ll find the stuff about the open market option embedded at the bottom of page four in small print and written in Latin. That’s why I think the take-up figure is so shockingly low. It’s not working: it wasn’t working back then and it’s not working now; commercial greed is the bottom line.”

If the current trend continues, insurers stand to make even greater sums: the number of pensioners is on course for a boom. Last year, 330,000 people bought annuity contracts with 12 billion pounds-worth of pension savings. By 2012, that figure is set to balloon to 18 billion pounds, as the baby boomer generation retires and the demise of final salary pension schemes continues.

By exercising the open market option, these people and the retirees that come before them can avoid handing insurers telephone-number profits. And, by all accounts, savers should be able to get a good deal: annuity rates are at a four-year high as the capital value of corporate bonds — used by insurers to back annuity contracts — plummets and yields stretch. “There have been 30 movements in annuity rates this year alone — the majority up,” says Callaghan. “It’s largely to do with the credit crisis and the continued spanking of corporate bonds. Annuities are one of the few beneficiaries of the credit crisis.” A beneficiary of the credit crunch? Well, I never.

Comments

I´m going to be honest with myself here, and the rest of this blogging community. old people are the scourge of my existence, personally anyway. I work in an old peoples home and they act a lot stupider than they look, the abuse myself and some of my colleagues have encountered whilst in the caring industry would be abhorrent to most members of the general public.

Many of them are claiming benefits that they´re not entitled to. In fact it is we who pay our taxes for these wrinklies to sit on their backsides all day and moan about younger people. It is well known within my profession that old people are rude about children, some of the atrocities to leave their mouths that i have witnessed are not the kind of thing i even hear at football matches!! they spit all over the place, wearing their baseball caps and “hoodies” they are the most corrosive element of any community/society

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •