<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think of Virgin&#8217;s fee-based download plan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2009/06/15/what-do-you-think-of-virgins-fee-based-download-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2009/06/15/what-do-you-think-of-virgins-fee-based-download-plan/</link>
	<description>Insights from the UK and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2009/06/15/what-do-you-think-of-virgins-fee-based-download-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-9414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/?p=3014#comment-9414</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see that this will stop people believing that the value of intellectual property is zero (especially given the depressing posts above from crooks), and that therefore there is nothing wrong with stealing it.   In essence the scheme just subsidy (this time with light users subsidising heavy users) and all subsidy is fundamentally unfair and unjust.

Me, I&#039;d just publish the names of the crooks along with a list of what they&#039;ve taken and let the IP creators decide just how nasty a debt recovery agency they want to employ.  Take someone&#039;s iPod away in part payment of their debt and there&#039;s no point in them stealing any more music....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see that this will stop people believing that the value of intellectual property is zero (especially given the depressing posts above from crooks), and that therefore there is nothing wrong with stealing it.   In essence the scheme just subsidy (this time with light users subsidising heavy users) and all subsidy is fundamentally unfair and unjust.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;d just publish the names of the crooks along with a list of what they&#8217;ve taken and let the IP creators decide just how nasty a debt recovery agency they want to employ.  Take someone&#8217;s iPod away in part payment of their debt and there&#8217;s no point in them stealing any more music&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gussy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2009/06/15/what-do-you-think-of-virgins-fee-based-download-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-9392</link>
		<dc:creator>Gussy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/?p=3014#comment-9392</guid>
		<description>I think it is chilling, and a bad step forward. Seeing that virgin said that it would &quot;never disconnect a user for file sharing&quot; They are going back on that promise. illegal file sharing only exists because of the fact that copyright has been extended again and again, currently it sits between 20-70 years. 

I would change my ISP if i got cut off. It will be interesting to see if it can stand up in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is chilling, and a bad step forward. Seeing that virgin said that it would &#8220;never disconnect a user for file sharing&#8221; They are going back on that promise. illegal file sharing only exists because of the fact that copyright has been extended again and again, currently it sits between 20-70 years. </p>
<p>I would change my ISP if i got cut off. It will be interesting to see if it can stand up in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Coady</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2009/06/15/what-do-you-think-of-virgins-fee-based-download-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Coady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/?p=3014#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>Seems like a great service .. I&#039;d end up paying for a month, downloading everything I want, then canceling before the month ends. Then maybe do that once or twice a year. Unless they had minimum terms and/or early termination fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a great service .. I&#8217;d end up paying for a month, downloading everything I want, then canceling before the month ends. Then maybe do that once or twice a year. Unless they had minimum terms and/or early termination fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig horner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2009/06/15/what-do-you-think-of-virgins-fee-based-download-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator>craig horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/?p=3014#comment-9386</guid>
		<description>I use &amp; pay for napster right now but if I don;t pay then all the tracks on my pc become useless. This idea from Virgin is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use &amp; pay for napster right now but if I don;t pay then all the tracks on my pc become useless. This idea from Virgin is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
