<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCC rules on Moir&#8217;s Gately column</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2010/02/18/pcc-rules-on-moirs-gately-column/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2010/02/18/pcc-rules-on-moirs-gately-column/</link>
	<description>Insights from the UK and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:39:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2010/02/18/pcc-rules-on-moirs-gately-column/comment-page-1/#comment-14401</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/?p=5572#comment-14401</guid>
		<description>The PCC ruling is correct!

If journalists were not allowed to report stories that offend some people then many reports would just not be publishable.  If the person who had died had been an MP, or even worse a banker, I&#039;m sure that the PCC would not have been called into action and the story would have been heralded as &quot;in the public interest&quot;.

This is another case of a vocal minority wanting to impose their views on the common people and control the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PCC ruling is correct!</p>
<p>If journalists were not allowed to report stories that offend some people then many reports would just not be publishable.  If the person who had died had been an MP, or even worse a banker, I&#8217;m sure that the PCC would not have been called into action and the story would have been heralded as &#8220;in the public interest&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is another case of a vocal minority wanting to impose their views on the common people and control the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
