(Updated on May 3 with new headline, election results, reaction and photos)

**For full coverage of the elections go to our special page**

The man described by some as a joke, by others as a brilliant mind has ended Ken Livingstone’s eight-year reign at City Hall.

The verdict is still out on what exactly Boris Johnson’s victory means for the Conservative Party overall but his performance as mayor could help determine whether people will vote for the Tories in a general election next time.

Johnson, whose experience of running big projects is limited, will lead one of the world’s most high-profile cities with an 11.3 billion pound budget to run public transport, police and fire services and promote the economy of this global financial centre.

The Labour Party may be hoping that the gaffe-prone “blond bombshell” will prove incapable of doing the job and thus damage the Conservatives chances of winning the next election. Johnson will have to get cracking soon with strong policies to bolster his image and become the ambassador that the Tories need him to be as the capital’s mayor.

Johnson paid generous tribute to Livingstone in his victory speech, describing him as “a very considerable public servant” and acknowledging that many who had voted for him had been wavering when it came to casting their votes.

“You shaped the office of mayor. You gave it national prominence and when London was attacked on 7 July 2005 you spoke for London,” Johnson said after he was declared winner in what had turned out to be a marathon vote count lasting well over 12 hours, partly due to a record turnout of 45 percent.

Livingstone in return offered to help Johnson and said that the responsibility for his defeat lay with him and him alone.

The Conservative candidate won with 1,168,738 first and second preference votes, compared with Livingstone’s 1,028,966.

Source: London Elects

The Johnson victory in London has added to Conservative delight at pushing Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Labour Party to its worst performance on record in local elections elsewhere in England and Wales.

Senior Conservative sources said they would be “gobsmacked” if Johnson did not win the mayoral contest, the Daily Telegraph said.

Even Minister for London Tessa Jowell conceded as we waited for the final result: “You’re absolutely right that it looks, at the moment, as if Boris Johnson is ahead,” she told the BBC.

Confidence of a Tory win was boosted after one bookmaker announced it was paying out on a Boris Johnson victory hours before the official result is expected later this evening.

Opinion polls had put Livingstone and Johnson neck-and-neck, with LibDem candidate Brian Paddick a distant third.

Should Shakespeare be a factor for Londoners voting for their next mayor on May 1?

The three leading mayoral candidates revealed their knowledge of the Bard on Friday in a live phone-in debate with host Vanessa Feltz on her BBC London morning radio show .

Asked by “David in Finchley” which Shakespearian character best described them, London Mayor Ken Livingstone said he would like to be associated with Julius Caesar .

“Trouble is, I’m sitting next to a couple of Brutuses,” he japed.

Conservative rival Boris Johnson said he hoped to be likened in future to Pericles.

“Pericles, of course, was responsible for the rejuvenation of Athens … and the wonderful thing about the Athenian system was its democracy.

“Everybody had the chance to vote and to decide the future of the policy, as they do on May 1, and that’s why I hope that Londoners in a Periclean way will vote for change for the better,” Johnson said, warming to his theme.

Liberal Democrat ex-policeman Brian Paddick opted out of the contest, protesting he didn’t know enough about Shakespeare to choose a role model. (”Come on,” cried Felz. “You’ve got a degree from Oxford.”)

“Lady Macbeth?”, suggested Livingstone. “Screw your courage to the sticking place, Brian,” said Johnson — an Oxford Classics scholar — quoting the Scottish play .

But it was the candidate without a degree that spotted Johnson’s Shakespearian trickery.

“I think we just caught Boris out,” said Livingstone. “The play Pericles by Shakespeare is not about Pericles, the ancient Greek, is it?”

“I don’t want to disappoint the mayor,” admitted a rueful Johnson. “He’s actually completely right. The Pericles in question is of course Pericles, Prince of Tyre.”

After the broadcast Johnson was unrepentant about his debating dodge, telling me he was just “taking liberties” with the title of the Shakespeare play, about a shipwrecked prince.

“It’s not the same Pericles, but it doesn’t matter. I was just using the name.”

Livingstone was delighted: “I never thought I’d catch Boris out on a classical anything.”

Which Shakespearian characters do you think the candidates most resemble?

Reuters Online invited readers to send in their questions to the four leading candidates in the Mayor of London election.

Transport and the Congestion Charge dominated your questions, but you also wanted to know about race relations.

Here are the answers from Labour’s Ken Livingstone, Conservative Boris Johnson, LibDem Brian Paddick and the Green Party’s Sian Berry.

For Ken Livingstone’s answers, read here

For Boris Johnson’s answers, read here

For Brian Paddick’s answers, read here

For the Sian Berry’s answers, read here

Boris Johnson, Conservative mayoral candidate, answers your questions: 

Q: Is Boris Johnson going to rephase back the traffic lights which ken Livingstone changed when he was elected and get London moving faster again? Posted by Kishore Mandalia

A: I do plan to rephrase traffic lights to get cars moving. Cars stuck at traffic lights emit twice the amount of CO2 and congsetion is now back to pre-congestion charge levels. It’s time to stop clobbering motorists and get London moving.

Q: What concrete steps would Boris Johnson take, if elected, to ensure that corruption, nepotism, waste of public money on foreign trips and on armies of unnecessary apparatchiks are not going to be a feature of his mayoralty, or does he think they are an inevitable feature of modern political life? Posted by Alex

A: Cronyism and a lack of transparency has mired the Livingstone mayoralty in maladministration. There are 732 staff in the City Hall building intended for 440 and staffing costs have more than trebled since 2001.  In 2006, the Mayor’s office spent almost a quarter of a million pounds on foreign travel.

I want to be a Mayor for all of London, focusing on London issues and not attempting to adopt a foreign policy. I will not be inviting controversial characters to visit London; people who stand against the very values that I treasure so greatly about this city.

All my advisers will have their details and register of interests accessible on the internet so that people can see what groups there are involved with and can contact them directly. If elected, I will launch an immediate review of City Hall’s finances, including grants given by the London Development Agency and make sure that Londoners get value for their money and can see where that money’s being spent.

Q: We were promised a world class transport system from the first mayoral elections, but life on the tube has gone from bad to worse. How do you propose to bring London’s Victorian age transport system to the 21st century. Posted by Raxa Mehta

A: London has the highest tube fares in Europe and Londoners deserve a service commensurate with that. People should be able to travel on public transport at any time of day or night without fear or intimidation.

I will focus on track and signal upgrades on the tube, which have all too often overrun and look again at getting airconditioning on the tube. I oppose the station closures proposed by the current Mayor and want all stations to be manned at all times during service. Banning alcohol on the tube will go a long way to cutting crime and making people feel more safe and comfortable travelling.

Q: What would you do as Mayor to improve paid employment prospects of disabled volunteers, who are all too frequently relegated to unemployment-related benefits and expenses due to lack of project funding? Posted by Alan Wheatley, working life-long disabled volunteer

A: Volunteers in London are responsible for providing hope and comfort to the vulnerable and disadvantaged and I thank you for all the wonderful work that you do. I want to get all Londoners who are able to work into work and upgrade the skills set of people across the city. 

There are currently too many agencies involved in employment and skills provision and I would consolidate the Adult Skills agenda, give the London Skills and Education Board more control over the London Development Agency’s budget for adult skills and promote skills to Londoners through a single branded service for advice and guidance. This would be a one-stop shop and would be able to specifically cater to disabled people looking for work.

We will also begin immediate discussions with the Government about the possibility of creating a single pool of public funding for skills in London by consolidating some of the various agencies’ spending into a single budget under the direction of the LSEB. This would make one body, directly accountable to Londoners through the Mayor, in charge of improving skills training in London — and ensure the maximum return on investment in skills by minimising bureaucracy.

Q: As a London resident I have noticed an increase in hostility from the recently immigrated population towards the culture, lifestyle and the customs of the settled population of London.
Would you: as London mayor: encourage the settled population to change the way they live their lives to appease the new population or would you prefer to encourage the new population to learn and respect londons cosmopolitan but British culture. And how would you go about it? Posted by Genevieve

A: London would not be the dynamic and vibrant city that it is without the input of people coming from all over the world to make London their home. I do believe that everyone coming to live in this country should learn English and the LSEB will help with funding for this and also that they should embrace the values of tolerance that has made London what it is today.

I will not stand for groups that preach hate and division and they will be stamped out. I do not, however, want or expect immigrant communities to abandon their traditions and cultures, but to integrate them into the patchwork that already exists in this great city and encourage inter-community dialogue to foster greater understanding and cohesion.

Q: I work as a district nurse for Southwark PCT. We have to visit patients within the congestion area on a daily basis to administer various medical treatments. We have to pay the congestion charge, claim this back from our PCT who in turn reclaim this from TFL. If a nurse forgets to purchase a ticket and accrues a fine it has to be paid from his or her own pocket.

One nurse last week had to pay over £160 in fines. Careless? No, not when we are dealing with seriously ill and dying patients. We cannot travel on public transport with medical records, body fluids and medical equipment. The sick people of Southwark are being penalised as nurses are loathe to visit the congestion area in fear of possible penalties. We are undertaking an essential service but if we were mini-cabs or vehicles for ‘pre-booked’ hire we would be exempt from the charge. This will never, ever make any sense to me. Please somebody help us. Posted by John Bailey

A: The clobbering of motorists with congestion charges fines by the current Labour Mayor is disgraceful — especially when, in this case, it persecutes people working to save lives. I will alter the current system so that motorists are given a monthly bill so that nurses and other crucial workers are not unjustly penalised.

Q: As the heart of the nation, London’s arterial roads that transport the nation’s economic life blood have chronic blockages that impair its health and the health of all who use them. Under Mayor Livingstone, congestion charges (statins), new larger buses (cholesterol) , more and more traffic lights (heart valves) and narrowing of the arteries by constructing more and more granite-edged islands and wider pavements have made matters far worse not better. Major surgery is needed.
Do any of the candidates have plans for seriously revamping TfL, changing the policy (and attitudes) to, for example, adopt tried and tested Tokyo methods for preventing arterial blockages - all road work at night and especially large holes covered with plates during the day. Do they agree with me that we must move with the times and construct elevated sections of road like the old Mancunian Way (say above The Highway, Thames Street and the Embankment) and again, emulate Tokyo’s road system (but do it better) where there are heart bypasses for through traffic built on stilts or in tunnels? - Posted by graham mellor

A: Congestion in London has now exceeded pre-Congestion charge levels and traffic is at a stand still. I want to get London moving again. I will re-phase the traffic lights to get traffic moving more smoothly.

I will be tougher with utility companies and lobby government to give the Mayor the power to fine companies who cause delays and I will re-instate the tidal flow in the Blackwall Tunnel at the earliest opportunity.

I will have a fresh approach to dealing with congestion in London that is about helping motorists, not penalising them as the current Mayor has sought to do.

In the first televised debate between the three main London mayoral candidates, we learned that former police chief Brian Paddick would not accept a job in a rival’s administration.

Paddick, who needs a huge swing in support to have any chance of election, has said that as mayor he would personally chair the Metropolitan Police Authority, which oversees the capital’s police.

But the Liberal Democrat candidate’s reply was quite clear when asked on BBC’s Newsnight whether he would serve under a re-elected Mayor Ken Livingstone, if offered the chance of running London police policy.

“No, I would not,” Paddick told host Jeremy Paxman during Tuesday’s programme.

“When I left the police I promised myself that I would only take advice, I would not take orders any more.”

We also learned that Livingstone would vote for Paddick — if forced to choose between him and the Tory runner Boris Johnson.

Perhaps little surprise there, but Labour’s Livingstone was the only one to answer Paxman’s question — which of the other two candidates would they vote for if they couldn’t vote for themselves.

Johnson “couldn’t possibly comment”, while Paddick couldn’t decide, saying his rivals were “bad in different ways”.

Every time Labour ministers call the Conservative candidate for London mayor by first name alone they’ll have to pay £5 into a ’swear box’.

“What we have to avoid is a situation where people think this election is a joke and that the future of London is not serious,” Olympics Minister Tessa Jowell told Sky News.

If this is all about taking the upcoming election seriously though, why has there been no similar decree regarding “Ken” (Livingstone), the equally maverick Labour candidate? And what will Labour do with all the money it makes from ministers who slip up?

Brian Paddick criticises the suggestion that Conservative London mayor candidate Boris Johnson could run the capital as a kind of chairman supported by expert advisers.

“I think a lot of people are prepared to entertain the idea of Boris Johnson as mayor on the assumption that he will be surrounded by advisers, who will effectively run London for him,” the Liberal Democrat candidate said in an interview with Reuters.

“If you allow your personal advisers that amount of power, you end up with the sort of allegations of corruption that Ken Livingstone has had to face.”

Click on video below | You can read a longer interview here

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

Last week in an interview with Reuters Ken Livingstone dismissed his rival Boris Johnson’s 12 point lead in the race for London Mayor in a YouGov poll as a quirk, resulting from its method of surveying voters over the internet.

He said a Guardian ICM poll using more traditional methods — telephoning a sample of voters — would show him in a much better position.

He would appear to have been proved correct — the poll, published online on Wednesday evening, shows he has narrowed the gap with Johnson to just 2 points, once second preference votes are counted.

The poll forecasts a narrow victory in the election on May 1 for Johnson with 51 percent of final votes and Livingstone on 49 percent.

On first choice votes the gap is even slimmer, with Johnson on 42 percent, Livingstone on 41 percent and Liberal Democrat Brian Paddick trailing far behind on 10 percent.

Sitting at the Evening Standard’s London Mayor debate last night, it occurred to me how cosy this election is. Whoever wins the contest on May 1 will lead one of the world’s most high-profile cities with an 11.3 billion pound budget to run public transport, police and fire services and promote the economy of this global financial centre. Yet at times the candidates seem to think they are engaging in some kind of school debating contest.

First there was breathless Boris, who bounded up to the podium like a precocious teenager and raced through his speech to cram in as much as possible during his allotted eight minutes. Then a more nervous, and far less exuberant delivery from the class swot — Brian Paddick — the former policeman turned Lib Dem mayoral candidate, who delivered a serious and earnest “Why I should be head boy” speech.

Throughout Paddick’s speech, Boris and Ken whispered to each other on the podium as if they thought they were at the back at the class and couldn’t be seen. Boris could barely contain his glee when Paddick slipped up in his bid to assert his desirability over a candidate (Johnson) who spends his time at the “Henry” regatta. His conflation of Henley with the Hooray Henries associated with Johnson’s consituency prompted a barely disguised giggle from Boris and his supporters.

Then came Ken, who looked a little beyond the city’s borders to place London in its global context: “The things we do in the city set the agenda for the world,” he told the audience of “influentials” in west London’s Cadogan Hall.

But still, it was difficult to shake the sense that this election contest is more village hall than City Hall. Questions and answers centred around the congestion charge, beat police officers, free travel passes for the under-16s and preserving gardens. It was only at the end that we got a real sense of the scope of this newly created role when columnist Simon Jenkins asked what vision the candidates had for the city. The answer seems to be not too many skyscrapers but well-designed ones are OK. The future of London as a world financial centre seemed less clear.

How will Ken Livingstone, Boris Johnson, Brian Paddick or Sian Berry spend London’s annual 11 billion-pound budget if they are elected mayor on May 1?

How will they tackle youth crime and congestion,  and how will the capital maintain its position as a global cultural and financial hub?

The budget is in their hands, but you can quiz them on how they will spend it.

The four leading candidates in the Mayor of London election have agreed to answer your questions.

We asked you to send in your questions, and have now sent a selection to the relevant candidates.

Their answers will be posted here on April 24.