UK News
Insights from the UK and beyond
from FaithWorld:
Pope apologizes for “unspeakable crimes” of sexual abuse
Pope Benedict apologized to victims of sexual abuse on Saturday, saying pedophile priests had brought "shame and humiliation" on him and the entire Roman Catholic Church. It was the 83-year-old pontiff's latest attempt to come to grips with the scandal that has rocked the 1.1 billion-member Church, particularly in Europe and the United States.
"I think of the immense suffering caused by the abuse of children, especially within the Church and by her ministers. Above all, I express my deep sorrow to the innocent victims of these unspeakable crimes ...," he said in his sermon in Westminster Cathedral, the mother church for Roman Catholics in England and Wales and a symbol of the struggle of Catholics here in the late 19th century to assert their rights after the Reformation.
"I also acknowledge with you the shame and humiliation that all of us have suffered because of these sins," he said, adding that he hoped "this chastisement" would contribute to the healing of the victims and the purification of the Church.
He has apologized before for sexual abuse by priests -- such as in the letter to the Catholics of Ireland last March -- and has acknowledged that the Church was slow to deal with the problem. But his comments on Saturday were among his most succinct to date.
The full quote from his sermon was: "Here too I think of the immense suffering caused by the abuse of children, especially within the Church and by her ministers. Above all, I express my deep sorrow to the innocent victims of these unspeakable crimes, along with my hope that the power of Christ’s grace, his sacrifice of reconciliation, will bring deep healing and peace to their lives. I also acknowledge, with you, the shame and humiliation which all of us have suffered because of these sins; and I invite you to offer it to the Lord with trust that this chastisement will contribute to the healing of the victims, the purification of the Church and the renewal of her age-old commitment to the education and care of young people. I express my gratitude for the efforts being made to address this problem responsibly, and I ask all of you to show your concern for the victims and solidarity with your priests."
How bad is the violence in UK cities?
Violence resembling the U.S. television crime series “The Wire” has become the norm in British cities, Conservative Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling says.
“It’s the world of the drama series ‘The Wire’ — a series that tracks the nightmare of drugs, gangs and organised crime in inner city west Baltimore. It’s a horrendous portrayal of the collapse of civilised life and of human despair.”
The Home Office refutes Grayling’s claim that violent crime has risen 70 percent since Labour came to power in 1997. The British Crime Survey, which is the best indicator of longer-term trends in crime shows a 41 percent decrease in incidents of violence since 1997,” said spokesman Simon Barrett.
Who’s right? Is it right to suggest that British cities reflect the gritty streets of Baltimore, Maryland?
American cities have been known for years for their off-limit pockets controlled by gun-wielding inner city gang members involved with drug-related crime.
Are we really getting that bad, or are the Conservatives just trying to score quick political points?
Most US cities have no-go areas especially at night. This is now only true in some parts of the UK, but things are getting worse.
Raising the price of alcohol
Chief Medical Officer Liam Donaldson has recommended that the government should sharply raise the price of alcohol to try to combat Britain’s chronic drinking problem.
His annual report calls for a minimum price of 50 pence per unit of alcohol sold, which would nearly double the price of some discount beer and wine. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have also shown interest in minimum pricing.
But the government is under no obligation to accept any such recommendation and is aware of the unpopularity of raising alcohol prices in a recession and not so far away from a general election.
Gordon Brown rejected the proposal outright.
The Conservatives say it is important to deal with people’s attitudes to drinking, not just supply and price, while the Liberal Democrats support putting an end to “pocket-money priced” alcohol.
What do you think? Does price play much of a part in Britain’s binge-drinking culture?
This is great news for supermarkets, now they can sell the cheapest for a very very good profit. No this will not stop binge drinking. Look at Norway and Sweden they still have massive issues and beer is around £4 per half pint. This will encourage less frequency in drinking habits but more binge; you only drink to get drunk as its expensive. Stop being our nanny and just let us get on with it.
Are children really becoming “animals?”
The charity Barnardo’s has released a poll showing over half the country thinks children are beginning to behave like animals.
Forty-nine percent of 2,021 people surveyed thought children now pose more of a danger to their peers and to adults with 43 percent saying something has to be done to protect them from youngsters.
Fifty-four percent thought children are beginning to behave like animals and 45 percent agreed that people refer to kids as “feral” because they behave that way.
Barnardo’s Chief Executive Martin Narey says it is appalling that people think that way.
What do you think?
We’ve left it a bit late. The problem now is that the parents of the sect we call yobs now are yobs themselves and their offspring will in turn be yobs, just a few more degrees violent and vicious than the present lot. We should have dealt with it at least a generation ago.
Now there’s no hope. With teachers and parents stripped of any power of discipline what can they do? They can’t even defend themselves against their children without risking prison.
So I think it’ll get worse. The do-gooders now don’t understand what kind of hell they’re letting themselves and us in for, with their softly softly misunderstood teenagers tactics.
Stripping off for money
A colleague tells me of a quick way to make cash for anyone who wants to. His neighbours discovered a pile of old taps and central heating pipes they had lying around had more value than they thought. A scrap metal merchant gave them £75 for them. ”It’s a bubble,” the merchant said.
It may be a bubble, but it’s proving a lasting one and one that’s causing problems in unexpected quarters too. In my salubrious part of Surrey, local churches are struggling to keep their roofs on and it’s not because of the volume of their congregations’ singing either. Thieves are stripping lead roofing and flashing to melt down and sell on.
It’s become a multi-million-pound problem across the country. Police have urged residents to call them if they ever see someone climbing on church roofs. And the churches themselves have decided they can’t afford to turn the other cheek. They’ve tried stake-outs and security patrols. Now, some are investing in special coatings that leave a unique lasting chemical impression on anyone who comes into contact with them.
It doesn’t solve the crime immediately, the police still have to find and arrest suspects for that to happen. But it’s a hefty deterrent – if they catch anyone climbing on roof tops they can carry out a quick check to discover if they have any traces of the chemical on them – if they do they can then be linked to specific offences and prosecuted.
There’s a line in the Old Testament of the Bible where Moses warns the Israelites, “Be sure, your sins will find you out.” I’m not sure he had this kind of technology in mind. But perhaps churches ought to be putting it on warning signs.
How safe is your street?
Ever wanted to know how many crimes were committed in your local area?
Well, by the end of the year you’ll be able to get some idea with every police force required to produce online interactive “crime maps”.
West Midlands and West Yorkshire are two of the forces who have put information about the number of offences in different neighbourhoods on their Web sites and on Wednesday the country’s biggest force, London’s Metropolitan Police, activated its crime mapping site.
The government believes that the maps will help alleviate public perceptions about crime, revealing that the number of actual offences is far lower than many people fear.
“By rolling out up-to-date, interactive crime maps, we can better inform people about crime problems in their area, and enable them to have much more of a say in what their local police focus on,” said Home Secretary Jacqui Smith last month.
“The latest annual crime figures showed another drop in crime nationwide but it’s important that people understand what this means to them in their local area and where challenges remain.”
New London Mayor Boris Johnson, who made providing the maps a key manifesto commitment, said it gave people the chance to see how their local police were performing.
When I see a bobby patrolling my street on foot at night, I’ll feel safe.
Anything else is smoke and mirrors.
Are bigger jails the answer?
Should Justice Secretary Jack Straw press ahead with plans to build three massive “Titan” jails housing up to 2,500 inmates each?
An alliance of 34 criminal justice charities and associations have written an open letter to Straw urging him to scrap the plans, arguing they will do nothing to reduce crime or tackle “sky-high” reoffending rates.
Prisons Minster James Hanson says in a consultation document the supersized Titan prisons will “ensure that we can respond to the needs of different offenders whilst capturing the best of what we do and the economies of scale available to us.”
But Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers disagrees, describing Titans as “flying in the face of our and others’ evidence that smaller prisons work better than large ones.”
“They may be more efficient, but at the cost of being less effective” she says in her latest annual report.
Many jails today have as few as 200 places, while the largest — Wandsworth in London — has 1,500.
It’s not only special interest groups who are complaining.
I think that the titan jails could indeed be something to look more into. It says in the article, “…designed to achieve supermarket efficiencies, saying they would be the equivalent of five 500-place prisons but with “shared services, like the gate and the catering.”” Five 500-place prisons would seem to mean that each five sections would be able to have some sort of individuality. It doesn’t sound as if the prison would loose its efficiency to reform inmates into civilized citizens, it sounds more as if it will be five 500-space prisons, and all individually ruled in one place. The only things that were mentioned as shared services were the catering and the management of the gate. Surely some more services will also be joining the shared service, but it would hardly be everything.
I also don’t think that a 500-space prison will have a lack of efficiency. I have a child of my own and therefore I have looked much into which schools to send my kid to and read every Ofsted report for the schools in my surrounding area, and it’s been quite a few schools. According to Ofsteds reports it isn’t how large the schools are that will prove how good they are, but how they’re run by the people in charge of the schools. I’ve read reports for schools that have had 400-500 students attending and they have still had the best of reviews from Ofsted. Therefore I strongly oppose the claim that small schools, and small prisons, would be the best thing. 500-space prisons would work well if they are governed correctly.
I totally agree with Chadwick’s idea of “one strike and you’re out” policy. This is something that is used in Sweden and also in some other countries. I do not see why citizens should pay for other country’s criminals. If you do the crime you should also pay the price for it. Nowadays it doesn’t seem as if criminals have any respect for prisons, and maybe tougher labour in prisons and longer sentences truly is the answer too.
Is the DNA database too big?
A “citizens’ inquiry” instigated by the Human Genetics Commission, a government advisory body, wants the records of people who have not been convicted, or whose convictions are long spent, to be deleted from the forensic National DNA Database and says the whole archive should be overseen by an independent body.
The database was established in 1995 in Britain – the country where scientists first pioneered the technique of DNA fingerprinting.
It now contains genetic profiles on more than 4 million people, representing the highest proportion of any population on a forensic DNA database in the world, at over 6 percent.
A future government might misuse the information, members of the inquiry fear. One says keeping all the DNA records would be the first step towards a totalitarian state.
Police, though, find the database a boon, especially in trying to solve ”cold” cases from the past.
What do you think? Is the database becoming too big?
People condemed the natzi’s for tattoing the jews to identify them, this DNA database is practically the same thing. Our forefathers fought for our freedom and they will be turning in their graves. We say NO! No! NO!
Knife crime – what can be done to stop it?
(This blog was updated on July 17 to include the latest crime figures. First posted May 14)
**For full coverage of crime in Britain click here **
It’s easy to speak of an epidemic amid the many headlines of stabbings in London. But the Metropolitan police, which has made tackling knife crime its top priority said on Friday despite more than 50 fatal stabbings so far this year London has an “issue with knives” rather than suffering from an epidemic.
To combat the “issue”, police have searched 27,000 people, arrested more than 1,200 and seized 500 knives in London during their six-week “Operation Blunt 2″ campaign.
Figures from the government’s British Crime Survey show there were 22,151 serious offences involving knives in England and Wales in the 12 months to March 2008, although overall crime fell significantly.
Politicians have called for tougher laws to deal with knife crime. Opposition leader David Cameron wants anyone caught carrying a knife to be jailed. Cameron’s custodial sentence demand goes one step further than Prime Minister Gordon Brown who said last month there should be a presumption to prosecute those aged 16 and 17 caught with a knife, rather than merely cautioning them.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith says that those convicted of carrying knives would be made to visit hospital emergency wards in attempt to confront them with the reality of stab wounds.
The biggest problem in my eyes is the human rights culture that runs through this country. When a crime of any type is committed and a jail sentence is given it should be for a minimum sentence and the sentence increased for bad behaviour, not the other way around. When a jail sentence is being served all human rights should be taken from the prisoner after all the prisoner had no thoughts for the victims rights. Prison should be made a place to avoid and that is how it should feel for the prisoner. He made the choice to be imprisoned
Banning swearing in pubs
Christian pub landlords John and Krista Fleming have been sacked after their attempts to ban swearing and gambling on horse races drove customers away in such large numbers that takings plummeted.
Regulars at the King’s Head in Islington, north London, complained that they were excessive in their Christian zeal. “They should have had pews in there, not chairs,” said one.
The Flemings however said all they were trying to do was to stop people swearing at the top of their voices at the bar and intimidating other customers. Arsenal supporters were among the main culprits apparently (!).
What do you think? Now that smoking is banned in pubs, was it a step too far to try and push the “F” word out of the door as well?
Or was this a brave — if hopeless — stand against the bellowing yobs who seem to be a permanent feature at the bar of so many of our pubs?
I think it’s good, ban smoking ban swearing and ban alcohol from all UK pubs, rename “pubs” to “Macdonalds”, then the little darlings can enjoy screaming and running riot in peace.
By the way, what ever happened to the old RU18 signs? Once upon a time you had to be an ADULT to visit a pub.
Pubs now are a total waste of time, I’ve no sympathy with the landlords, if they want to make money they should ALL make a stand and ignore smoking, swearing (and other adult activity) bans and get the adult drinkers back, and the kids out.

















The popes apologies have not brought support to myself or to any other survivor I know. In fact each of us only feels deceived and used once again.
The staggering part is that so many Catholics feel that is all that is necessary to say so that they can continue on in this socially destructive manner – ooops we are sorry, let us tell you how to live your life!
The following gives a present day view and understanding of the experience of survivors of clergy abuse and the continuing cover up. http://www.molestedcatholics.com/Not-in- my-lifetime
Be shocked by the global estimates of the numbers of those sexually abused by Catholic clergy. http://www.molestedcatholics.com/Estimat ing-the-numbers-global.php#stats