UK News
Insights from the UK and beyond
Oona King to run as Labour candidate for mayoral election
Once one of “Blair’s Babes“, former Labour MP Oona King has thrown down the gauntlet to former Mayor Ken Livingstone with the announcement of her official bid to become Labour’s candidate to run for London mayor in 2012.
King served as the second black woman MP in Britain after Diane Abbott, the MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, who was elected in 1987.
Until her defeat by Respect’s George Galloway in 2005, King represented Bethnal Green and Bow in the Commons for 8 years from 1997 to 2005 under Prime Minister Tony Blair’s leadership.
In a 2007 autobiography titled “House Music: The Oona King diaries“, King details her life as an MP, including the challenges she faced after announcing her support of Britain’s role in the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
King, currently head of diversity at Channel 4, will have to defeat anti-establishment Labour candidate Livingstone to compete against Conservative incumbent Mayor Boris Johnson in 2012. Last year, Livingstone announced a challenge to Johnson.
Livingstone was the first elected mayor of London. He was elected as an independent candidate in 2000, but in 2004 he ran for the post again under the Labour banner and served as mayor until 2008 when he was defeated by Johnson.
He was leader of the Greater London Council from 1981 until Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s government abolished it in 1986.
There is no substitute for me, says Boris
The resignation of another key aide to Mayor Boris Johnson has sparked renewed questions over the Mayor of London’s leadership, with opposition leaders at City Hall charging that the “wheels are coming off” his new administration.
Tim Parker , the First Deputy Mayor and Chairman of Transport for London (TfL), has stepped down from both jobs, saying it was inappropriate for him to hold them as an unelected official. His resignation is the third of a key aide in the four months of Johnson’s mayorship.
Despite having a rather big job to do already in running the capital, Johnson will now chair TfL himself. In his usual combative style he announced: “Over the last few weeks, it has become increasingly apparent to both of us that the nature of the decisions that need to be taken are highly political and there is no substitute for me, as the directly elected Mayor, being in charge.There are limits, therefore, to what can be delegated.”
It begs the question why Parker was installed in both roles in the first place – the running of London’s transport system has always been a politically charged issue.
More important for the future though is whether Johnson is biting off more than he can chew by chairing TfL. Even in times of crisis, delegation to top aides will be crucial for the mayor’s success. One of the key arguments against voting for Johnson as mayor was his perceived lack of managing a large organisation, and judging by the rate at which senior aides are disappearing, he looks set for a rough ride, not least as yet another strike is looming on the London Underground.
Alcohol might be a good substitute?!
Seriously – what ON EARTH are you doing Boris? Why are you giving us all the distinct impresion that you have taken leave of your senses somewhere between the bathroom and the kitchen?
Get back in the office and start behaving like the stateman we thought you could be.
You need to be dynamic and decisive and at least try to show that you really have got it all together.
London deserves better and you have little time left before the tide of opinion turns against you.
Mayoral hopefuls take the Shakespeare test
Should Shakespeare be a factor for Londoners voting for their next mayor on May 1?
The three leading mayoral candidates revealed their knowledge of the Bard on Friday in a live phone-in debate with host Vanessa Feltz on her BBC London morning radio show .
Asked by “David in Finchley” which Shakespearian character best described them, London Mayor Ken Livingstone said he would like to be associated with Julius Caesar .
“Trouble is, I’m sitting next to a couple of Brutuses,” he japed.
Conservative rival Boris Johnson said he hoped to be likened in future to Pericles.
“Pericles, of course, was responsible for the rejuvenation of Athens … and the wonderful thing about the Athenian system was its democracy.
Ken – Antonio, the false Duke Of Milan in The Tempest.
Boris – Brutus, Caesar’s assassin in Julius Caesar.
The rest? Bit players. One or other of these two will win the day. Either Antonio survives by villainous trickery or Brutus slips the knife between his ribs (seems a bit naughty but he did claim to have done it for the good of Rome).
Mayor of London Q&A answers
Reuters Online invited readers to send in their questions to the four leading candidates in the Mayor of London election.
Transport and the Congestion Charge dominated your questions, but you also wanted to know about race relations.
Here are the answers from Labour’s Ken Livingstone, Conservative Boris Johnson, LibDem Brian Paddick and the Green Party’s Sian Berry.
For Ken Livingstone’s answers, read here
For Boris Johnson’s answers, read here
For Brian Paddick’s answers, read here
For the Sian Berry’s answers, read here
On the issue of youths carrying knives and guns and utilising our transport systems especially buses to carry them around, I strongly believe that introducing some form of “metal detectors” at bus entrances should help in deterring this act. Although the idea might be tricky in case of “bendy buses”, it should help with other type of buses.
Heat is on at Reuters Newsmaker with London mayor candidates
** For full coverage of the mayoral election go to our special report **
Safer streets, better housing, more reliable transport….that’s what Ken Livingstone, Boris Johnson and Brian Paddick all want for London and it’s probably what most Londoners want for their city. But what’s the big difference then between “Red Ken”, “Crazy Boris” and …”Policeman turned Politician” Brian Paddick?
That’s still hard to fathom two weeks ahead of the May 1 London mayor election. But there was an air of tetchiness and getting personal during a Reuters Newsmaker debate at Reuters headquarters in London in front of an invited audience of around 250 people.
Liberal Democrat candidate Paddick told Livingstone he had “lost the plot” during his second term.
Ken “vote for me, I’m worth it” Livingstone hit out at Conservative candidate Johnson saying among the hardest decisions he ever had to take was to decide where to go for lunch with his former staff at “The Spectator” while he was editor of the right-wing magazine.
Johnson himself lashed out at the mayor for being inconsistent in his policies (“he wants millions of Chinese to come to London as tourists but is against a third runway at Heathrow” he said of Ken) and for “overpaying” his officials at City Hall. Ken himself was candid about what type of tourist he wants – the ones who spend the most money….not the Belgians…who according to him spend the least.
Under pressure from a lack of experience in managing large teams and projects, Johnson broke new ground (for himself) by finally announcing one person to join his ranks – Bob Diamond, the U.S.-born president of Barclays will join his team of advisors.
Call him Johnson
Every time Labour ministers call the Conservative candidate for London mayor by first name alone they’ll have to pay £5 into a ‘swear box’.
“What we have to avoid is a situation where people think this election is a joke and that the future of London is not serious,” Olympics Minister Tessa Jowell told Sky News.
If this is all about taking the upcoming election seriously though, why has there been no similar decree regarding “Ken” (Livingstone), the equally maverick Labour candidate? And what will Labour do with all the money it makes from ministers who slip up?
They could use the money to buy a leaving present for Ken, but perhaps that would be too nice a gesture for the “nasty party”.
Ken narrows the gap
Last week in an interview with Reuters Ken Livingstone dismissed his rival Boris Johnson’s 12 point lead in the race for London Mayor in a YouGov poll as a quirk, resulting from its method of surveying voters over the internet.
He said a Guardian ICM poll using more traditional methods — telephoning a sample of voters — would show him in a much better position.
He would appear to have been proved correct — the poll, published online on Wednesday evening, shows he has narrowed the gap with Johnson to just 2 points, once second preference votes are counted.
The poll forecasts a narrow victory in the election on May 1 for Johnson with 51 percent of final votes and Livingstone on 49 percent.
On first choice votes the gap is even slimmer, with Johnson on 42 percent, Livingstone on 41 percent and Liberal Democrat Brian Paddick trailing far behind on 10 percent.
Commonsense will prevail. Livingstone is a newt breeder.
The Ken and Boris show
Sitting at the Evening Standard’s London Mayor debate last night, it occurred to me how cosy this election is. Whoever wins the contest on May 1 will lead one of the world’s most high-profile cities with an 11.3 billion pound budget to run public transport, police and fire services and promote the economy of this global financial centre. Yet at times the candidates seem to think they are engaging in some kind of school debating contest.
First there was breathless Boris, who bounded up to the podium like a precocious teenager and raced through his speech to cram in as much as possible during his allotted eight minutes. Then a more nervous, and far less exuberant delivery from the class swot — Brian Paddick — the former policeman turned Lib Dem mayoral candidate, who delivered a serious and earnest “Why I should be head boy” speech.
Throughout Paddick’s speech, Boris and Ken whispered to each other on the podium as if they thought they were at the back at the class and couldn’t be seen. Boris could barely contain his glee when Paddick slipped up in his bid to assert his desirability over a candidate (Johnson) who spends his time at the “Henry” regatta. His conflation of Henley with the Hooray Henries associated with Johnson’s consituency prompted a barely disguised giggle from Boris and his supporters.
Then came Ken, who looked a little beyond the city’s borders to place London in its global context: “The things we do in the city set the agenda for the world,” he told the audience of “influentials” in west London’s Cadogan Hall.
But still, it was difficult to shake the sense that this election contest is more village hall than City Hall. Questions and answers centred around the congestion charge, beat police officers, free travel passes for the under-16s and preserving gardens. It was only at the end that we got a real sense of the scope of this newly created role when columnist Simon Jenkins asked what vision the candidates had for the city. The answer seems to be not too many skyscrapers but well-designed ones are OK. The future of London as a world financial centre seemed less clear.
i wonder why Mr.Barnbrook from the BNP was not invited or was this just another anti BNP media dig at them .
Ken dismisses negative poll
Ken Livingstone talks to Tim Castle about standing for a third term as Mayor of London.
He dismisses a recent YouGov poll that shows him trailing Conservative rival Boris Johnson and says his rival candidates are all “Ken Lites” who have moved their policies closer to his.
He says questions about his age or suggestions that he has been in the post too long are “ephemera” designed to avoid the real issues in the campaign.
Click on the video below to see the full interview.
Paddick: “Not being a politician is an advantage”
Brian Paddick talks to Tim Castle about his autobiography and his candidacy for the mayoral election in London.
He says not being a politician is a “distinct advantage” when running against Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson.
“They are big personalities but they are not the sort of personalities that Londoners really want running London.”
Click on the video below to see the full interview.
















