Bank IPOs expose dark arts of Chinese finance

March 17, 2016

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Hong Kong’s stock market is shining a new light on the dark arts of Chinese finance. The country’s mid-sized lenders have become skilled at repackaging loans to look like lower-risk investments. Two impending share offerings from state-backed banks underscore how such wizardry has fueled growth.

In recent years mid-sized Chinese banks have devoted an increasing proportion of their balance sheets to various investment products, often issued by other financial institutions. These vehicles, known as trust plans, asset management plans or wealth management products, tend to be backed by loans or bonds, though it’s often hard to tell exactly where the money has ended up.

What’s clear, however, is that Chinese banks find this business more attractive than regular lending. This may be because it requires them to hold less capital than for corporate loans, and also carry fewer provisions for possible bad debts.

To see how important this business has become, just look at China Zheshang Bank, which is based in Hangzhou, the home town of e-commerce giant Alibaba. It is currently completing a $1.75 billion initial public offering in Hong Kong. At the end of 2013, Zheshang had less than $3 billion of debt instruments, such as wealth management products, on its balance sheet. By the end of last year this had exploded to $66 billion – 42 percent of its total assets. Income and fees from these activities – which the bank calls “Treasury Business” – brought in a staggering 80 percent of pre-tax profit last year.

It isn’t alone. Bank of Tianjin, which is seeking to raise $1.23 billion from Hong Kong investors, has also embraced what it calls “non-standard credit”. The group, whose shareholders include Australia’s ANZ, had $19 billion of such loans outstanding in September last year – three times as much as at the end of 2012.

Chinese banks’ increasing dependence on these financial instruments raises several risks. For one, it means that long-term and illiquid loans are increasingly funded with short-term investments which are susceptible to a sudden loss of confidence. Second, it increases the web of links between banks and other financial institutions, increasing the vulnerability of the overall system. Rapid growth also raises the risks of loose lending. Financial sorcery rarely ends well.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

Is this similar to The US meltdown?

Posted by hjim | Report as abusive

American banks with their derivatives and skulduggery to sell all sorts of complex and opaque financial instruments is good. The same in China is bad. Never would have figured this out myself. The writer should keep such biased opinions to himself, and if he cannot, at least be honest about the financial markets.

Posted by ArghONaught | Report as abusive